Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:10:56.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuing Nationalism in Yugoslav Historiography1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Michael B. Petrovich
Michael B. Petrovich*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was in late 1964, in a major address before the 8th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, that Tito condemned “various negative ‘traditions’” in the sphere of Yugoslav historiography. He called for resolutely “stamping out nationalistic interpretations of the cultural achievements and legacy of the past.” Tito deplored “un-Marxist, uncritical and unscientific appraisals of events and personalities in national history” which were sometimes mere repetitions of “certain bourgeois-nationalistic assessments.” He specified, “For instance, only the positive aspect of certain movements, events and persons is stressed while their negative side is hardly ever mentioned, or, if so, only in general terms and reluctantly. Further, we come across cases, although less frequently, where some sort of superiority of one national history and culture over another is stressed in some indirect way.” Tito warned that nationalistic conceptions in Yugoslav historiography often assumed a political character and led to disputes of “ugly proportions.” In 1966 Tito had occasion once again to warn that some historians were poisoning relations between the nationalities of Yugoslavia by discussing “who had what great men and when” and which nationality had “a more glorious past.”

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Fall 1978 , pp. 161 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe, 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. This paper was presented at the ninth national convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies in Washington D.C., October 15, 1977.Google Scholar

2. Tito, Josip Broz, “The Role of the League of Communists in the Further Development of Socialist Social Relations and Current Problems in the International Workers' Movement and in the Struggle for Peace and Socialism in the World,” in VIII Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia; Practice and Theory of Socialist Development in Yugoslavia (Belgrade: Medjunarodna Politika, 1965), p. 40.Google Scholar

3. Vucinich, Wayne S., “Nationalism and Communism,” in Contemporary Yugoslavia; Twenty Years of Socialist Experiment, ed. Wayne S. Vucinich (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969), pp. 277-78.Google Scholar

4. For an analysis of the 1971 Yugoslav census in terms of the nationalities question, see the chapter by Michael B. Petrovich, “Population Structure,” in Südosteuropa-Handbuch, 1, Jugoslawien (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1975), pp. 322-44.Google Scholar

5. Vucinich, , “Nationalism,” p. 278.Google Scholar

6. Ibid. Google Scholar

7. Plenča, Dušan, “O nacionalnim pojavama i deformacijama u istoriografiji oslo-bodilačkog rata i revolucije,” Gledišta, 6, no. 1 (1965), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

8. Bogdanov, Vaso, “Porijeklo i ciljevi šovinističkih teza o držanju Hrvata 1941,” Zbornik Historijskog Instituta Jugoslavenske Akademije Znanosti i Umjetnosti (Zagreb, 1961), pp. 5–91.Google Scholar

9. Istorija naroda Jugoslavije, 1. Bogo Grafenauer, Dušan Perovič and Jaroslav Sidak (Belgrade: Prosveta, 1953; also other editions).Google Scholar

10. Istorija naroda Jugoslavije, 2, ed. Bogo Grafenauer, Branislav Djurdjev and Jorjo Tadić (Belgrade: Prosveta, 1960; also other editions).Google Scholar

11. Vucinich, , “Nationalism,” p. 281.Google Scholar

12. Ekmečić, Milorad, “Odgovor na neke kritike ‘Istorije Jugoslavije’ (XIX vijek),” Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 13, nos. 1–2 (1974), p. 280.Google Scholar

13. Božić, Ivan, Ćirković, Sima, Ekmečić, Milorad, and Dedijer, Vladimir, Istorija Jugoslavije (Belgrade: Prosveta, 1972).Google Scholar

14. Ćorović, Vladimir, Istorija Jugoslavije (Belgrade: Narodno Delo, 1933). Anto Babić published an Istorija naroda Jugoslavije (Sarajevo: Svjetlost, 1948) soon after the Second World War which was criticized by the Communist Party, despite the author's high political and academic position, and has been ignored. Nor have the many reviewers of the recent volume by Božić et al., taken into account several relatively brief school textbooks on Yugoslav history when making comparisons, since only Ćorović's volume is deemed to be of comparable scholarly significance.Google Scholar

15. Dedijer, Vladimir, Božić, I., Ćirković, S., and Ekmečić, M., History of Yugoslavia (New York: McGraw Hill, 1974).Google Scholar

16. See the excellent series of reports by Rusinow, Dennison I., “Crisis in Croatia,” published in four parts in the American Universities Field Staff Reports, Southeast Europe Series, 19, nos. 4 through 7 (1972); as well as his book The Yugoslav Experiment 1948-1974 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977), especially the last two chapters, which contain much of the material in the above reports.Google Scholar

17. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor,” p. 230. For Ekmečić's list of reviews of Istorija Jugoslavije see especially footnote 1, pp. 217-18.Google Scholar

18. “Istorija Jugoslavije,” Gledišta, 14, no. 3 (March, 1973), p. 261-62, editors' note.Google Scholar

19. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor,” p. 232.Google Scholar

20. Bojić, Alija, “Istorija Jugoslavije,” Gledišta, 14, no. 3 (March, 1973), p. 309.Google Scholar

21. Kljaković, Vojmir, ibid., p. 281.Google Scholar

22. Gross, Mirjana, “Ideja jugoslavenstva u XIX stoljeću u ‘Istoriji Jugoslavije’,” Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest, 2 (1973), p. 8.Google Scholar

23. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor,” p. 218.Google Scholar

24. Ekmečić, , “Završna riječ u polemici sa Mirjanom Gross,” Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 15, nos. 1-2 (1976), p. 156.Google Scholar

25. Sućeska, Avdo, “Odgovor Miloradu Ekmečiću,” Gledišta, 16, no. 10 (October, 1975), pp. 945-46.Google Scholar

26. Gross, , “Ideja,” p. 8.Google Scholar

27. Sućeska, , “Istorija Jugoslavije,” Gledišta, 14, no. 3 (March, 1973), pp. 262-63.Google Scholar

28. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 220.Google Scholar

29. Ibid, p. 222.Google Scholar

30. Šidak, Jaroslav, review of Istorija Jugoslavije in Naše Teme (October, 1973), 1752-53.Google Scholar

31. Gross, , “Ideja,” pp. 157-58.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., p. 160.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., p. 158.Google Scholar

34. Sućeska, , “Odgovor Miloradu Ekmečiću,” 946-47.Google Scholar

35. Imamovic, Mustafa, “Istorija Jugoslavije,” Gledišta, 14, no. 3 (March, 1973), p. 321; Sućeska, ibid., p. 263.Google Scholar

36. Bojić, , “Istorija,” p. 307.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., pp. 305–306.Google Scholar

38. Gross, , “Ideja,” p. 8.Google Scholar

39. Kljaković, , loc. cit., pp. 279–280.Google Scholar

40. Sućeska, , “Istorijske osnove nacionalne posebnosti bosansko-hercegovačkih Muslimana,” Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 8, no. 4 (1969), pp. 47–54, especially p. 53.Google Scholar

41. Sućeska, , “Istorija Jugoslavije,” 263-65.Google Scholar

42. Sućeska, , “Odgovor Miloradu Ekmečiću,” 947; Imamović, “Istorija,” p. 324.Google Scholar

43. Imamović, , “Nekoliko bilježaka povodom odgovora Milorada Ekmečića na neke kritike ‘Istorije Jugoslavije’,” Gledišta, 16, no. 10 (October, 1975); pp. 953-54.Google Scholar

44. Ekmečić, , review of Šidak, Gross, Karaman, and Šepić, Povijest hrvatskog naroda g. 1860.-1940 (Zagreb: Školska Knjiga, 1968) in Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 8, no. 3 (1969), p. 89.Google Scholar

45. Gross, , “Ideja,” p. 158.Google Scholar

46. Ciliga, Vera, “O pogledima Milorada Ekmečića na hrvatsku povijest,” Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 14, nos. 3-4 (1975), p. 165.Google Scholar

47. Ciliga, Vera, “O interpretaciji hrvatske povijesti XIX st. u ‘Istoriji Jugoslavije,’” Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest, 5, 2 [12] (1973), p. 25.Google Scholar

48. Ciliga, , “O pogledima …,” p. 166.Google Scholar

49. Ciliga, , “O interpretaciji …,” p. 22.Google Scholar

50. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” pp. 232-33.Google Scholar

51. Gross, , “Ideja,” pp. 123, 159.Google Scholar

52. Ibid., p. 122.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar

54. Ekmečć, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 236.Google Scholar

55. Strčić, Petar, “Primjedbe na tekst o Istri u drugoj polovici XIX st. u ‘Prosvetinoj’ Istoriji Jugoslavije,” Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest, 5, no. 1 [11], (1973), pp. 195–210.Google Scholar

56. Strčić, Petar, “Zašto M. Ekmečić nije pobio niti jednu od mojih 49 primjedbi,” Jugoslovenski Istorijski Časopis, 14, nos. 1-2 (1975), p. 183.Google Scholar

57. Ibid. Google Scholar

58. See, for example, the study by Perić, Ivan, Suvremeni hrvatski nacionalizam; izvori i izrazi (Zagreb: “August Cesarec,” 1976), especially the section “Frankovačko-ustaška struja,” pp. 118-32.Google Scholar

59. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 250.Google Scholar

60. Gross, Mirjana, “O nacionalnoj ideologiji Ante Starčevića i Eugene Kvaternika,” Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest, 1, (1972), p. 26.Google Scholar

61. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 250.Google Scholar

62. Ibid., p. 238.Google Scholar

63. Ciliga, , “O interpretaciji …,” p. 29.Google Scholar

64. Ekmečić. “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 245.Google Scholar

65. Ibid. Google Scholar

66. Božić et al., Istorija Jugoslavije, pp. 267 and 402 respectively.Google Scholar

67. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 245.Google Scholar

68. Ibid., p. 246.Google Scholar

69. Ibid., p. 236.Google Scholar

70. Gross, , “Ideja jugoslavenstva …,” pp. 10, 121.Google Scholar

71. Ibid., p. 127.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., pp. 122-23.Google Scholar

73. Ibid., p. 160.Google Scholar

74. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 241.Google Scholar

75. Gross, Mirjana, “Maliciozne marginalije o ‘delikatnim’ pitanjima,” Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest, 3, no. 1 (1971), p. 222.Google Scholar

76. Ekmečić, , “Odgovor na neke kritike …,” p. 280.Google Scholar

77. Imamović, , “Istorija Jugoslavije,” p. 326.Google Scholar

78. Grafenauer, Bogo, Zgodovina slovenskega naroda, 2nd rev. ed. (Ljubljana: Državna Založba Slovenije, 1964-); Institut za nacionalna istorija — Skopje, Istorija na makedonskiot narod, (Skopje: Nova Makedonija, 1969); Redakcija za Istoriju Crne Gore, Istorija Crne Gore (Titograd: Redakcija za Istoriju Crne Gore, 1967-).Google Scholar