Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:52:32.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Carabinieri Stood by: The Italian State and the “Slavic Threat” in 1919–1922

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Maura Hametz
Maura Hametz*
Affiliation:
Old Dominion University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 2 August 1919 in the Upper Adriatic port city of Trieste (as it was called in Italian) or Trst (as it was referred to in Slavic languages), nationalist youths harassed socialist children returning from a group outing. The incident escalated into a riot. Police opened fire, and one nationalist was killed. On 12 July 1920, a nationalist mob incited by Fascists looted and burned Narodni Dom, the Slovene cultural center. The carabinieri, Italy's state police, collaborated in the attack, or at the very least stood by and watched as the building was torched using gasoline obtained from the nearby barracks. The next day, Italian nationalist demonstrators torched the Croatian-managed Adriatic Bank. Police at the scene stood on the sidelines and watched the bank burn. In the autumn of 1920, Fascist squads attacked a funeral procession mourning a socialist worker killed in a general strike. The socialists erected barricades in the streets of the San Giacomo quarter, a working class neighborhood. Police leveled the undefended barricades and intimidated the quarter's residents during a house-to-house search. In 1921, a firebomb exploded in the offices of Il Lavoratore, the local socialist newspaper. Police watched the premises burn. In all five instances, the forces of public security in Trieste stood by, unable or unwilling to stem violence and restore order in the city newly annexed to Italy from the Habsburg empire. The Italian liberal authorities officially disavowed mistreatment of ethnic minorities and members of the political opposition, but they found themselves unable to deal effectively with the clash among ethnic groups and political parties precipitated by the transfer of the territory to Italian sovereignty. They sympathized with those adopting extra-legal and violent strategies that they perceived as useful to further state political agendas and promote assimilation, or at least quiescence, of the border population.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 559 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Rusinow, Dennison I., Italy's Austrian Heritage 1919–1946 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969), pp. 95–96.Google Scholar

2. Rusinow, , Italy's Austrian Heritage, pp. 101–104; and Gaetano Salvemini, Racial Minorities under Fascism in Italy (Chicago: Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, 1934), p. 4.Google Scholar

3. Archivio di Stato (Trieste)—Commissariato Generale Civile per la Venezia Giulia, hereafter AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), Ufficio VI, Busta 21 from Banca Adriatica to CGCVG, 20 July 1921. Some research for this article was conducted prior to the recent renumbering of files at the archive.Google Scholar

4. Novak, Bogdan C., Trieste 1941–1954: The Ethnic, Political, and Ideological Struggle (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970), pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

5. Ranchi, Sergio and Rossi, Marina, Il Lavoratore: Richerche e testimonianze su novantanni di storia di un giornale (Trieste: Dedolibri, 1986), pp. 38–44.Google Scholar

6. For the standard accounts of the liberal government's role in the rise of Fascism in Trieste, see Apih, Elio, Italia fascismo e anti-fascismo nella Venezia Giulia, 1918—1943 (Bari: Laterza, 1966), in Italian; and Rusinow, Italy's Austrian Heritage, in English.Google Scholar

7. The vast majority of Slavs in Trieste were Slovenes. According to the Austrian census of 1910, they constituted 28% of the city's population (52% were counted as Italian). Croats were a much smaller minority. They were combined with the Serbs by the Austrian authorities, and together the groups accounted for only 1% of the city's population. The general use of the term “Slavic” here to denote the ethnic minority population in Trieste reflects the conflation of the various groups by Italian and Western European authorities. It does not imply that members of the various groups genetically labeled as Slavs shared common political or cultural aims or identities.Google Scholar

8. Selb, August and Tischbein, A., eds, Memorie Viaggio Pittorio Littorale Austriaco (Trieste, 1842), Preface.Google Scholar

9. Bazlen, Roberto, “Intervista su Trieste,” in Scritti (Milan: Adelphi Edizioni, 1984), p. 251. The fragment was written immediately following the Second World War.Google Scholar

10. Millo, Anna, l'Élite del potere a Trieste: Una biografia collettiva 1891–1938 (Milan: Franco Angeli, 1989), pp. 43–68.Google Scholar

11. Capuzzo, Ester, “Sull'introduzione dell'amministrazione italiana a Trento e a Trieste (1918–1919),” Clio, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1987, p. 260.Google Scholar

12. Italians and Slovenes, who constituted less than 3% and 5%, respectively of the Habsburg population, were the primary inhabitants of Trieste and the city's near hinterlands. Marina Cattaruzza, “Slovenes and Italians in Trieste, 1850–1914,” in Engman, Max, ed., Ethnic Identity in Urban Europe (New York: New York University Press, 1992), pp. 189–190.Google Scholar

13. Lyttelton, , The Seizure of Power, pp. 17, 32.Google Scholar

14. Cattaruzza, , “Slovenes and Italians in Trieste, 1850–1914,” pp. 191–192.Google Scholar

15. Sluga, Glenda, The Problem of Trieste and the Italo-Yugoslav Border: Difference, Identity, and Sovereignty in Twentieth-Century Europe (Albany: State University Press of New York, 2001) provides the most recent account of the territorial dispute and ethnic strife from an external perspective.Google Scholar

16. The creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes in the wake of the First World War attested to the fragmentation of the populations of the South Slav state. In 1929, with the suppression of the constitution by King Alexander I, it would become Yugoslavia.Google Scholar

17. The Treaty of Rapallo of 1920 ostensibly settled the issue by internationalizing a portion of the territory including the city of Fiume/Rijeka. The inability of the international community and in particular the League of Nations to enforce the settlement made it untenable, and by 1924 Mussolini's Italy would extend its eastern borders to include the city. Yugoslavia gained control of Rijeka/Fiume after the Second World War. The city now lies in Croatia.Google Scholar

18. For an account of the Jews in Trieste prior to the First World War, see Catalan, Tullia, La comunità ebraica di Trieste (1781–1914): politica, società e cultura (Trieste: Lint, 2000). For the period following the First World War, see Silva Bon, Gli ebrei a Trieste 1930–1945: identità, persecuzione, risposte (Gorizia, Italy: Libreria editrice goriziana, 2000).Google Scholar

19. On Italy and the peace conference, see Albrecht-Carrié, Rene, Italy at the Paris Peace Conference (Hamden, CT: Archon, 1938).Google Scholar

20. Ziller, Paolo, “Le nuove provincie nell'immediato dopoguerra. Tra ricostruzione e autonomie amministrative (1918–1922),” in Salimbeni, Fulvio, ed., Dal litorale austriaco alla Venezia Giulia: Miscelleanea di studi giuliani (Udine: Del Bianco, 1991), p. 250.Google Scholar

21. Rusinow, , Italy's Austrian Heritage, pp. 109–110.Google Scholar

22. Riccardi, Luca, “Francesco Salata, Il trattato di Rapallo e la politica estera italiana verso la Jugoslavia all'inizio degli anni venti,” Quaderni Giuliani di Storia, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1994, pp. 76–77.Google Scholar

23. Albrecht-Carrié, , Italy at the Paris Peace Conference, pp. 70–71, 200.Google Scholar

24. Quoted in Visintin, , l'Italia a Trieste: l'operato del governo militare italiano nella Venezia Giulia, 1918–1919 (Gorizia, Italy: Libreria Editrice Goriziana, 2000), p. 30.Google Scholar

25. Visintin, , l'Italia a Trieste, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

26. De'stefani, Alberto, Documenti sulla condizione finanziaria ed economica dell'Italia (Rome: Libreria dello Stato, 1923), pp. 152–153; and Ziller, , “Le nuove provincie nell'immediato dopoguerra.” pp. 247–248.Google Scholar

27. Benco, Silvio, Trieste e il suo diritto all'Italia (Bologna: Cappelli, 1952), p. 117.Google Scholar

28. Saba, Umberto, “Il molo,” in Trieste e una donna, 1910–1912 (Milan: Mondadori, 1962), p. 60.Google Scholar

29. McCourt, John, The Years of Bloom: James Joyce in Trieste (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000), p. 3. After the Second World War, Trieste's position at the edge of Western civilization would be engraved on Western memory by Winston Churchill's famous characterization of the iron curtain stretching from “Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic.” David Cannadine, ed., Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat: The Speeches of Winston Churchill (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989), p. 303.Google Scholar

30. Todorova, Maria, Imagining the Balkans (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997) discusses the construction of “civilized European identity” in opposition to the conception of the “Balkans.”Google Scholar

31. Visintin, Angelo, l'Italia a Trieste: l'operato del governo militare italiano nella Venezia Giulia, 1918–1919 (Gorizia, Italy: Libreria Editrice Goriziana, 2000), p. 139. Of course, the lines of distinction were not quite that clear. Ethnic Italians living in imperial lands had also been subjected to the Austrian draft. Ethnic Slavs and Italians had engaged in resistance against Austria.Google Scholar

32. Mosconi, , I primi anni di governo italiano, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

33. Lyttelton, Adrian, The Seizure of Power: Fascism in Italy 1919–1929 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), p. 53; Rusinow, Italy's Austrian Heritage, p. 93.Google Scholar

34. Mosconi, Antonio, I primi anni di governo italiano nella Venezia Giulia, Trieste 1919–1922 (Bologna: L. Cappelli, 1924), pp. 11–13.Google Scholar

35. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 85, “Spirito pubblico di Trieste.”Google Scholar

36. Apih, Elio, Italia fascismo e anti-fascismo nella Venezia Giulia, 1918–1943 (Bari: Laterza, 1966), p. 142.Google Scholar

37. Archivio diplomatico, Biblioteca Civica, Trieste—R. P. MS MISC 142/L1-20 from Silvio Benco to Attilio Tamaro, 12 November 1920.Google Scholar

38. Evidence of big business's support for ultra-nationalist groups can be found in Apih, Italia fascismo e anti-fascismo, pp. 135–141. For example, office space for Giunta's Fascio was provided by Assicurazioni Generali, the largest Triestine insurance firm.Google Scholar

39. Rusinow, , Italy's Austrian Heritage, pp. 95–96.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., pp. 101–104.Google Scholar

41. Unione Antifascista Italo-Slovena, Trieste nella lotta per la democrazia (Trieste: Comitato cittadino dell'UAIS, 1945), p. 9.Google Scholar

42. Visintin, , l'Italia a Trieste, p. 144.Google Scholar

43. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 21, from Banca Adriatica to CGCVG, 20 July 1920.Google Scholar

44. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 21, “Banche austriache—liquidazione.”Google Scholar

45. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 21, “Banche austriache— liquidazione.”Google Scholar

46. AdS(TS)- CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 35, “Limitazione di accesso nella Venezia Giulia.”Google Scholar

47. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 41, “Criterio per regolare il rimpatrio e 1'accesso a Trieste.”Google Scholar

48. Exact figures for the number of petitioners seeking access to Trieste are unavailable. Although many of the documents pertaining to repatriation remain in the file on “repatriation,” others were passed along to different arms of the government. According to notes in the repatriation files, some made their way to police files. Many were linked to citizenship requests filed separately by the authorities. These were moved en masse to Fascist files that remain closed to researchers.Google Scholar

49. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 35, 41 passim. Google Scholar

50. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 35 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

51. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Ufficio IV—1920, busta 11, 7 May 1920 and AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922) Busta 35 (Rimpatrie A–M).Google Scholar

52. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922) Busta 35 (Rimpatrie A–M).Google Scholar

53. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto, busta 36 (Rimpatrie N–Z).Google Scholar

54. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 36 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

55. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 41 (varie).Google Scholar

56. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 36 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

57. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 35 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

58. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 35 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

59. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 35 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

60. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 36 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

61. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti di gabinetto (1919–1922), busta 36 (Rimpatrie).Google Scholar

62. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 41, “Ferrovie.”Google Scholar

63. AdS(TS)-CGCVG, Atti generali (1919–1922), busta 41, “Miniere di Carpano-Vines.”Google Scholar

64. Silvestri, Claudio, Dalla redenzione al fascismo; Trieste 1918–1922 (Udine: Del Bianco, 1959), p. 114; Rusinow, Italy's Austrian Heritage, p. 108.Google Scholar