No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond the Borders of the Fallen Empire: André Mandelstam’s Project for Non-Territorial Autonomy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2022
Abstract
This article seeks to analyze the project for the international convention on the protection of minority rights, which was proposed by André Mandelstam at the Institut de Droit International (IDI) in 1928. In this project, the author used the concept of non-territorial autonomy borrowed from the works of the Austro-Marxists Otto Bauer and Karl Renner. A Russian international lawyer in emigration, André Mandelstam had initially been involved in the implementation of elements of non-territorial autonomy to protect the Christian population of the Ottoman empire. Mandelstam’s proposed convention assumed that personal autonomy, reduced to the protection of minorities from cultural and linguistic assimilation, would be a compromise between protecting minorities and preventing them from undermining the unity of the state. However, the demand for international protection of minorities was not accompanied by any enforcement mechanism. The project underwent serious revisions as it was discussed by a group of international lawyers. In its final version, the text retained only those of the original articles, which referred to individual human rights. Thus, Mandelstam’s attempt to make his convention acceptable for all participating states resulted in omission of the very concept of personal autonomy in the final version of the proposed document.
Keywords
- Type
- Special Issue Article
- Information
- Nationalities Papers , Volume 50 , Issue 5: Special Issue on Accommodating National Diversity Within States , September 2022 , pp. 963 - 982
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Adak, Hülya. 2018. “The Legacy of André Mandelstam and the Early History of Human Rights.” Zeitschrift für Religions und Geistgeschichte, Heft 2: 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexopolous, Golfo. 2006. “Soviet Citizenship, More or Less: Rights, Emotions, and States of Civic Belonging.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 7 (3): 487–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, Helmut. 2014. “From Diplomat to Academic Activist: André Mandelstam and the History of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 25 (4): 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, Martin. 2019. “On Parallel Tracks at Different Speeds: Historiographies of Imperial Russia and Globalized World around 1900.” Comparativ. Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und Vergleichende Gesellschaftsforschung 29 (2): 78–104.Google Scholar
Bauer, Otto. 2000. The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bernatzik, E. 1910. Über nationale Matriken. Inaugurationsrede gehalten von Edmund Bernatzik. Wien: Manz.Google Scholar
Burgers, Jan. 1992. “The Road to San Francisco: The Revival of Human Rights Idea in the Twentieth Century.” Human Rights Quarterly 14 (4): 447–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernev, Borislav. 2017. Twilight of Empire: the Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917–1918. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Benjamin. 2016. Legalist Empire. International Law and American Foreign Relations in the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duparc, Jacques. 1922.
La Protection des Minorités de Race, de Langue, et de Religion
. Étude de Driot des Gens. Paris: Labrairie Dalloz.Google Scholar
Dyroff, Stefan. 2014. “Minority Rights and Humanitarism.” Journal of Modern European History 12 (2): 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Carole. 2000. “Minority Rights as an International Question.” Contemporary European History 9 (3): 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Carole. 2006. Defending the Rights of Others: Great Powers, the Jews, and International Minority Protection, 1878–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg. 2012. “Völkerrecht.” In Dimensionen internationaler Geschichte. Düffer, Jost, Loth, Wilfried, eds. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit. 1984. The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gousseff, Catherine. 2008. L’Exil Russe (1920–1939): La Fabrique du Réfugié Apatride. Paris: CNRS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabar, Vladimir. 1958. Materialy k istorii literatury mezhdunarodnogo prava v Rossii (1647 – 1917). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Gusejnova, Dina. 2016. European Elites and Ideas of Empire, 1917–1957. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusejnova, Dina. 2019. “Roman Law after 1917: Exile, Statelessness and the Search for Bizantium in the Work of Mikhail von Taube.” Tuori, Kaius and Björklund, Heta eds. Roman Law and the Idea of Europe. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 93–112.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. 2005. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holquist, Peter. 2006. “Dilemmas of a Progressive Administrator: Baron Boris Nolde.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 7 (2): 241–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holquist, Peter. 2011. “The Politics and Practice of the Russian Occupation of Armenia, 1915 – February 1917.” In A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks in the End of the Ottoman Empire. Suny, Ronald Grigor, Göcek, Fatma Müge and Naimark, Norman M eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holquist, Peter. 2020. “‘Now [in 1914] even the obligatory norms of the Hague Conference are flouted’: Vladimir Grabar on the International Law of War” Paper presented to ASEEES Annual Convention.Google Scholar
Hull, Isabel. 2014. A Scrap of Paper. Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War. Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. Resolutions Adopted by Inter-Parliamentary Union and Principal Decisions of the Council, 1911–1936. 1937. Geneva: MESSRS. PAYOT.Google Scholar
Kévonian, Dzovinar. 2015. “André Mandelstam and the internationalization of human rights (1869–1949).” In Revisiting the Origins of Human Rights. Slotte, Pamela and Halme-Tuomisaari, Miia eds. 239–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocho-Williams, Alastair. 2020. “‘Embassy without Government’: the Council of Ambassadors and the Persistence of Tsarist Diplomacy after the Russian Revolution.” Diplomacy and Statecraft 31 (3): 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokoshkin, Fedor. 1905. “Doklad organizatsionnomu biuro s”ezdu zemskikh i gorodskikh deiatelei po voprosu o pravakh natsional’nostei i detsentralizatsii upravleniia i zakonodatel’stva.” Pravo 40 (9 October).Google Scholar
Koskienniemi, Martti. 2004. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kovács, Mária. 2005. “The Problem of Continuity Between the 1920 Numerus Clausus and Post 1938 Anti-Jewish Legislation in Hungary.” East European Jewish Affairs 35 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmany, Börries. 2016. “Habsburg Austria Experiments in Non-Territorial Autonomy.” Ethnopolitics 15 (1): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzmany, Börries. 2020.“Non-Territorial National Autonomy in Interwar European Minority Protection and its Habsburg Legacies.” In Remaking Central Europe: The League of Nations and the Former Habsburg Lands. Becker, Peter and Wheatley, Natasha eds. 317–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maklakov, Vasilii. 2002. “V.A.Maklakov – B.A. Bakhmetievu, 10 janvaria 1922” Budnitskii, Oleg (ed.). ‘Sovershenno lichno i doveritel’no!’ B.A.Bakhmetiev and V.A.Maklakov: perepiska, 1919-1951. Moscow: ROSSPEN.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri. 2011. “Vladimir Hrabar: the Cosmopolitan International Lawyer.” Al’manakh mezhdunarodnogo prava 3: 138–162.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, Andrei. 1900. Gaagskie konferentsii o kodifikatsii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. St. Petersburg: Tipografiia A.Benke. V. 1–2.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, Andrei. 1915. “Statut Armenii” Budushchee ustroistvo Armenii po ofitsial’nym diplomaticheskim dokumentam Oranzhevoi knigi, traktuiushchei reform v Armenii. Petrograd: Osvobozhdenie.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, André. 1919. Mémoire sur la délimitation des Droits de L’État et de la Nation d’aprés la doctrine du Président Wilson. Paris: Imprimerie Poliglotte Hugonis.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, André. 1920. “Postoiannyi Mezhdunarodnyi sud i nachalo ravenstva gosudarstv.” Sovremennye zapiski 2: 245–250.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, André. 1923. “La Protection des Minorités” Recueil de Cours. Académie des droit international de la Haye. Paris: Librairie Hachette. V.1.Google Scholar
André, Mandelstam. 1925. “La Protection Internationale des Minorités.” Annuaire de l’Institute de Driot International. Paris: A. Pedone. V.32: 246–292.Google Scholar
André, Mandelstam. 1928. “Rapport supplémentaire sur la protection des minorités” Annuaire de l’Institute de Driot International. Paris: A. Pedone. V.34.Google Scholar
André, Mandelstam. 1929. “Protection internationale des droits de l’homme, du citoyen et des minorités.” Annuaire de l’Institute de Driot International. Paris: A. Pedone. V.35.1Google Scholar
Mandelstam, Andrei. 1930. “N’iu-Iorkskaia deklaratsiia instituta mezhdunarodnogo prava” Sovremennye zapiski 42: 508–522.Google Scholar
André, Mandelstam. 1931. “Protection des minorités.” Annuaire de l’Institute de Driot International. Paris: A. Pedone. V.36: 514–566.Google Scholar
Mandelstam, Andrei. 2004. “O pravovom polozhenii russkikh emigrantov v inostrannykh gosudarstvakh, kotorye priznali by Sovetskuiu respubliku” Russkie bezhentsy. Problemy rasseleniia, vozvrashcheniia na Rodinu, uregulirovanie pravovogo polozheniia (1920–1930 gg.). Sbornik dokumentov. Moscow: ROSSPEN: 227–228.Google Scholar
Manela, Erez. 2007. The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Terry. 2001. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923 – 1939. Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhailovsky, Georgii. 1993. Zapiski iz istorii rossiiskogo vneshnepoliticheskogo vedomstva, 1914–1920. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 1993. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 1998. Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2004. “The Strange Triumph of Human Rights, 1933–1950.” The Historical Journal 47 (2): 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathans, Benjamin. 2002. Beyond the Pale: The Jewish Encounter with Late Imperial Russia. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 2005. “The National-Cultural Autonomy Model Revisited.” In National Cultural Autonomy and its Contemporary Critics. Nimni, Ephraim ed. London: Routledge: 1–11.Google Scholar
Nolde, Boris. 1917. Natsional’nyi vopros v Rossii. Petrograd: Tipografiia Suvorina. “Novoe vremia.”Google Scholar
Osterkamp, Jana. 2018. “Ein Reich ohne Eigenschaften? Das Erbe föderaler Ideen in den ‘Nachfolgestaaten’ der Habsburgermonarchie.” In Die Habsburgermonarchie, 1848 – 1918. Rumpler, Helmut and Harmat, Ulrike eds. 431–457. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band XII.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, Jana. 2020. Vielfalt Ordnen: Eine Foderale Geschichte Der Habsburgermonarchie Vom Vormarz Bis 1918. München: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan. 2015. The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrazhitsky, Lev. 1910. Teoriia prava i gosudarstva v sviazi s teoriei nravstvennosti. St. Petersburg: Tipografiia M. Merkusheva. V.2.Google Scholar
Protokoly Tsentral’nogo Komiteta i zagranichnykh grupp konstitutsionno-demokraticheskoi partii, 1905–1930. 1996. Moscow: ROSSPEN. V.4.Google Scholar
Renner, Karl. 2005. “State and Nation.” In National-Cultural Autonomy and its Contemporary Critics. Nimni, Ephraim ed. London and New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Michael. 2011. Shattering Empires. The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodogno, Davide. 2012. Against Massacre: Humanitarian Intervention in the Ottoman Empire, 1815 – 1914. The Emergence of a European Concept and International Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sablin, Ivan and Semyonov, Alexander. 2018. “Autonomy and Decentralization in the Global Imperial Crisis: the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union in 1905 – 1924.” Modern Intellectual History 17 (2): 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S”ezdy i konferentsii konstitutsionno-demokraticheskoi partii. 2000. Moscow: ROSSPEN. V.3Google Scholar
Siegelberg, Mira. 2020. Statelessness: A Modern History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skran, Claudena. 1995. Refugees in Inter-War Europe: The Emergence of a Regime. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David, Germane, Marina, and Housden, Martyn. 2019. “‘Forgotten Europeans’: transnational minority activism in the age of European integration.” Nations and Nationalism 25 (2): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolin, Anatolii. 2017. U zakrytykh dverei Versal’skogo dvortsa. Parizhskaia mirnaia konferentsiia i russkaia diplomatiia v 1919 godu. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Starodubtsev, Grigorii. 2000. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaia nauka rossiiskoi emigratsii (1918 – 1939). Moscow: Kniga i bizness.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald. 2015. They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else: A History of the Armenian Genocide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ther, Philipp. 2019. The Outsiders: Refugees in Europe since 1492. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Viefhaus, Erwin. 2017. Die Minderheitenfrage und Entstehung der Minderheitenschutzverträge auf der Parisien Friedenskonferenz 1919; eine Studie zur Geschichte des Nationalitätenproblems im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Mein: Central and Eastern European Online Library.Google Scholar
Vishniak, Mark. 1926. “Mandelstam André.“La Protection Internationale des Minorités” 1925. Paris. Edit. de l’Institute de Driot International” Sovremennye zapiski 27:599–601.Google Scholar
Weitz, Eric. 2008. “From the Vienna to the Paris System: International Politics and the Entangled Histories of Human Rights, Forced Deportations, and Civilizing Missions.” The American Historical Review 113 (5): 1313–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz, Eric. 2019. A World Divided: The Global Struggle for Human Rights in the Age of Nation-States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Elizabeth. 2017. “The Legal Status of Russian Refugees, 1921–1936.” In Modern Refugees as Challengers of Nation-State Sovereignty: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Ben-Nun, Gilad and Caestecker, Frank eds. 18–38. Leipzig: Leipziger Universiätsverlag.Google Scholar
Wolzendorff, Kurt. 1921. Grundgedanken des Rechts der nationalen Minderheiten (Naturrecht des Minderheitenschutzes). Berlin: Verlag von Hans Robert Engelmann.Google Scholar