Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:45:41.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Examination of Russian Imperialism: Russian Military and Intellectual Descriptions of the Caucasians during the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Keziban Acar
Keziban Acar*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Celar Bayar University, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In nineteenth-century Russia, the Caucasus was a large region composed of various territories and ethnic and religious groups. This region included Circassia, Mingrelia, Georgia, a part of Armenia, the ancient Media, Daghestan and the territories of Suanctians, Ossetians, Abkhazians, Karakalpaks and other mountaineer nations. During the nineteenth century, Persia, Russia and the Ottoman Empire wanted to establish their influence and power on the Caucasus. Due to this conflict, these powers, especially Russia with Persia and Russia with the Ottoman Empire, fought with each other.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 7 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Anita L. P. Burdett, ed., Caucasus Boundaries: Documents and Maps, 1802–1946 (Archive Editions, 1996), p. 279.Google Scholar

2. Ariel Cohen, Russian Imperialism: Development and Crisis (Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 1996), p. 55; Abdullah Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Göçleri (1856–1876) (Ankara: TTK, 1997), p. 25.Google Scholar

3. Edward Allworth, Central Asia: A Century of Russian Rule (New York: Columbia University Press, 1967), p. 59.Google Scholar

4. Michael Khodarskovsky, “Ignoble Savages and Unfaithful Subjects: Constructing Non-Christian Identities in Early Modern Russia,” in Daniel R. Brower and Edward J. Lazzerini, eds, Russia's Orient: Imperial Borderlands and Peoples, 1700–1917 (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press), p. 10.Google Scholar

5. Khodarskovsky, “Ignoble Savages and Unfaithful Subjects,” p. 11.Google Scholar

6. Susan Lay ton, Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 157. Even though she primarily focuses on the Caucasians’ portrayals in Russian literature, Lay ton gives valuable information on Russian military views of the Caucasians as well.Google Scholar

7. Layton, Russian Literature and Empire, p. 172.Google Scholar

8. Marie Bennigsen Broxup, “Russia and the North Caucasus,” in Marie Bennigsen Broxup, ed., The North Caucasus Barrier: The Russian Advance Towards the Muslim World (London: Hurst, 1992), p. 1, Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Göçleri, p. 28, Akdes Nimet Kurat, Rusya Tarihi, Baslanglçtan 1917'e Kadar, 3rd edn (Ankara: TTK, 1993), p. 155.Google Scholar

9. Justin McCarthy, Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims 1821–1922 (Princeton: Darwin Press, 1995), p. 33.Google Scholar

10. Ali Kasumov-Hasan Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1: Çerkeslerin XIX. Ÿuzy1l Kurtulus Savasi Tarihi (Ankara: Kaf-Der, 1995), p. 90.Google Scholar

11. Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Gǒçleri, p. 42.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., p. 68.Google Scholar

13. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyklrlml, pp. 70–73.Google Scholar

14. Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Gǒçleri, p. 42.Google Scholar

15. Ariel Cohen, Russian Imperialism: Development and Crisis (Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 1996), p. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Gǒçleri, p. 44, Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, p. 75.Google Scholar

17. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, p. 118.Google Scholar

18. Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Gǒçleri, p. 45.Google Scholar

19. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, p. 75, Henze, p. 63.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., p. 119.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., p. 141.Google Scholar

22. Saydam, KIrIm ve Kafkas Gǒçleri, p. 46.Google Scholar

23. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, p. 165.Google Scholar

24. Ibid., p. 168.Google Scholar

25. John F. Baddeley, The Russian Conquest of the Caucasus (Curzon Press, 1999), p. 231.Google Scholar

26. Moshe Gammer, Muslim Resistance to the Tsar: Shamil and the Conquest of Chechnia and Daghestan (Frank Cass, 1994), p. 292.Google Scholar

27. Even though Bogdanovich did not take an active part in the Russian army during the Crimean War or the Russo-Turkish war, I still consider him a member of the Russian military elite due to his military background and his focus on the wars as a military historian. He studied in a regiment of the nobility and in 1823 was promoted to the rank of an officer. He finished the war academy (1835) and in 1838 earned the title of adjutant professor, and from 1843 on worked as a professor of war historiography at the department of the history in the Ministry of War. Great Soviet Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, p. 531.Google Scholar

28. Mikhail Bogdanovich, Vostochnaia Voina 1853–1856 godov, Vol. 4 (St Petersburg, 1876), p. 231.Google Scholar

29. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, pp. 174–188.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., p. 173.Google Scholar

31. Gammer, Muslim Resistance to the Tsar, p. 293.Google Scholar

32. Hélène Carrère d'Encausse, “Systematic Conquest, 1865 to 1884,” in Edward Allworth, ed., Central Asia: A Century of Russian Rule (New York: Columbia University Press, 1967), p. 131.Google Scholar

33. d'Encausse, “Systematic Conquest, 1865 to 1884,” p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. McCarthy, Death and Exile, p. 34.Google Scholar

35. Austin Lee Jersild, “From Savagery to Citizenship: Caucasian Mountaineers and Muslims in the Russian Empire,” in Daniel R. Brower and Edward J. Lazzerini, eds, Russia's Orient: Imperial Borderlands and Peoples, 1700–1917 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), pp. 103–104; Dov Yaroshevski, “Empire and Citizenship,” in Brower and Lazzerini, Russia's Orient, p. 71.Google Scholar

36. Ibid. pp. 109–111.Google Scholar

37. Islam Ansiklopedisi, Vol. 3, p. 330.Google Scholar

38. Gammer, Muslim Resistance to the Tsar, p. 294.Google Scholar

39. Kasumov, Çerkes Soyk1r1m1, p. 284.Google Scholar

40. V. P. Mescherskii, Kavkazkoi Putevoi Dnevnik, 1877–78 (St Petersburg, 1880), p. 16.Google Scholar

41. Ibid. Google Scholar

42. Ibid. Google Scholar

43. Gazenkompf, p. 12.Google Scholar

44. Edward C. Thaden, Conservative Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Russia, (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1964), p. 199.Google Scholar

45. Ibid., p. 299.Google Scholar

46. Mescherskii, Kavkazkoi Putevoi Dnevnik, p. 35.Google Scholar

47. N. Maksimov, “Za Dunaem,” Otechestvennie Zapiski, No. 9, 1878, p. 346.Google Scholar

48. Ibid. Google Scholar

49. Danchenko reported the war for a newly founded St Petersburg daily, Nash Vek (Our Century): Louise McReynolds, The News under Russia's Old Regime: The Development of a Mass-Circulation Press (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), p. 87.Google Scholar

50. A. N. Maslov, God Voiny v Maloi Azii, 1877–78 (St Petersburg, 1879), p. 47.Google Scholar

51. Mescherskii, Kavkazkoi Putevoi Dnevnik, p. 121.Google Scholar

52. Ibid., p. 122.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., p. 320.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., p. 122.Google Scholar

55. Ibid., p. 320.Google Scholar

56. Maslov, God Voiny v Maloi Azii, p. 47.Google Scholar

57. Ibid. Google Scholar

58. Mescherskii, Kavkazkoi Putevoi Dnevnik, p. 107.Google Scholar

59. Maslov, God Voiny v Maloi Azii, p. 47.Google Scholar

60. V. M. Vonliarskii, Vospominaniia ordinartsa o voine 1877–78 gg. (St Petersburg, 1891), p. 21.Google Scholar

61. Layton, Russian Literature and Empire, p. 156.Google Scholar

62. Mikhail Bogdanovich, Vostochnaia Voina 1853–56 godov, Vol. 2 (St Petersburg, 1876), p. 149.Google Scholar

63. Robert H. MacFonald, The Language of Empire: Myths and Metaphors of Popular Imperialism, 1880–1918 (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press), p. 4.Google Scholar

64. Bennigsen Broxup, “Russia and the North Caucasus,” p. 14.Google Scholar