Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:42:32.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Youth Mobility Scheme: The Panacea for Ending Free Movement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Erica Consterdine
Erica Consterdine*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography/Sussex Centre for Migration Research, University of Sussex
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Free movement has been at the heart of the Brexit debate, with the government grappling between satisfying public and business demands for restrictive and liberal approaches to immigration respectively. In response the government have advocated temporary migration as a potential solution, including an expanded UK-EU Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) modelled on the current T5 YMS on the assumption that YMS migrants undertake low-skilled jobs. Little is known about this visa or the labour market activity of YMS migrants. Drawing on policy analysis alongside survey and interview data from Australian YMS migrants, this paper seeks to bridge some of these knowledge gaps, arguing that an expanded EU YMS will not attract significant EU migrants, and is far from a remedy for free movement ending.

Keywords

youth mobility schemetemporary immigrationBrexitlabour marketUK immigration policyF22J08
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 248 , May 2019 , pp. R40 - R48
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported under the Temporary versus Permanent Migration project (TEMPER). This project received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613488. With thanks to Alexandra Urdea, Martine Huberty and Adam Prangnell who provided research assistance.

References

Afonso, A. and Devitt, D. (2018), ‘To be less dependent on immigration, Britain must change its model of capitalism’, LSE: British Politics and Policy, available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/to-be-less-dependent-on-immigration-britain-must-change-its-model-of-capitalism/.Google Scholar
Andrucki, A. (2010), ‘The visa whiteness machine: transnational motility in post-apartheid South Africa’, Ethnicities, 10(3), pp. 358–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. (2011), ‘Prime Minister's speech on immigration, 10 October’, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-on-immigration.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, C. (2011), Guest workers: Settlement, Temporary Economic Migration and a Critique of the government's Plans, London: IPPR.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (2004), ‘Mobility, fixity, agency: Australia's working holiday programme’, Population, Space and Place, 10, 5, pp. 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confederation of British Industries (CBI) (2018), ‘Open and Controlled: a new approach to immigration after Brexit’, available at: http://www.cbi.org.uk/index.cfm/_api/render/file/?method=inline&fileID=4232B592-ACCC-40DB-9338BA0A97198435, pp: 3–4.Google Scholar
Conradson, C. and Latham, L. (2005), ‘Friendship, networks and transnationality in a world city: Antipodean transmigrants in London’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 2, pp. 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consterdine, C. (2017), ‘Community versus commonwealth: reappraising the 1971 Immigration Act’, Immigrants and Minorities, 35, 1, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consterdine, C. and Hampshire, H. (2016), Coding Legal Regimes of Immigration Entry to the EU with a focus on Labour Immigration, Madrid: Temper, available at: http://www.temperproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Working-Paper-8.pdf.Google Scholar
Davies, D. (2017), ‘Will London survive as a financial centre after Brexit?’, The Guardian, 26 April, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/26/london-financial-centre-brexit-eu-paris-frankfurt-uk.Google Scholar
Davies, D. and Rolfe, R. (2017), ‘Facing the future: tackling post-Brexit labour and skills shortages’, CIPD and NIESR.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, F. and Dronkers, J. (2010), ‘Unemployment among immigrants in European labour markets: an analysis of origin and destination effects’, Work, Employment and Society, 24, pp. 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, H. and Soskice, S.W. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Government (2018a), The Future Relationship between the UK and the European Union, London: HM Government, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/725288/The_future_relationship_between_the_United_Kingdom_and_the_European_Union.pdf.Google Scholar
HM Government (2018b), The UK's Future Skill-based Immigration System, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/766465/The-UKs-future-skills-based-immigration-system-print-ready.pdf.Google Scholar
Home Office (2002), Working Holidaymakers Scheme: Consultation Documents, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2017), Why Do People Come to the UK?, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-statistics-july-to-september-2017/why-do-people-come-to-the-uk-2-to-work.Google Scholar
Hugo, H. (2008), ‘Immigrant settlement outside of Australia's capital cities’, Population, Space and Place, 14, 6, pp. 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, M. (2010), ‘Immigration: Home Secretary's speech of 5 November 2010’, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/immigration-home-secretarys-speech-of-5-november-2010.Google Scholar
Menz, M. (2008), The Political Economy of Managed Migration: Nonstate Actors, Europeanization, and the Politics of Designing Migration Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migration Observatory (2018), Exploiting the Opportunity? Low-Skilled Work Migration After Brexit, available at: https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/reports/exploiting-the-opportunity-low-skilled-work-migration-after-brexit/.Google Scholar
Reilly, R. (2015), ‘Low-cost labour or cultural exchange? Reforming the Working Holiday visa programme’, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 26, 3, pp. 474–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, R. (2010), ‘Working on Holiday: relationships between tourism and work among young Canadians in Edinburgh’, Anthropology in Action, 17, 1, pp. 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, R. (2014), ‘Time and temporary migration: the case of temporary graduate workers and working holiday makers in Australia’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 12, pp. 1915–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhs, R. and Martin, M. (2008), ‘Numbers vs. rights: trade-offs and guest worker programs’, International Migration Review, 42, 1, pp. 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, J. and Millar, M. (2006), ‘Foreign labour in the United Kingdom: current patterns and trends’, Labour Market Trends, October, pp. 335–55.Google Scholar
Strauss, S. and McGrath, M. (2017), ‘Temporary migration, precarious employment and unfree labour relations: exploring the continuum of exploitation in Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker Program’, Geoforum, 78, pp.199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, V. (2007), ‘Super-diversity and its implications’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 6, pp. 1024–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W., Fisher, F. and Moore, M. (2009), ‘The OE goes home: cultural aspects of a working holiday experience’, Tourist Studies, 9(1), pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar