Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T14:18:08.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The UK Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Extract

The underlying pattern of growth over the course of last summer has proven difficult to interpret from the national accounts data. What at first appears to be a recovery, from the low rate of growth seen at the beginning of last year, gaining momentum over the summer, is instead likely to be an initial bounce back in the second quarter followed by further weakness in growth. The Office for National Statistics estimates that without the disruption associated with the Jubilee holiday, quarterly GDP growth would have decelerated from 0.8–1.3 per cent in the second quarter to 0.2–0.5 per cent in the third quarter last year. This is in contrast with the acceleration in growth from 0.6 to 0.9 per cent per quarter over the same period suggested by the national accounts, portraying a rather different picture of the economic recovery. Preliminary estimates of GDP suggest that the economy expanded by 0.4 per cent in the fourth quarter of last year. This is as we anticipated when preparing the forecast, which was completed before the fourth quarter estimates of GDP were released. Taken together, the figures for the fourth quarter and the estimates of growth in the absence of the disruption associated with the Jubilee holiday suggests that the recovery has been slow to gather pace in the second half of the year. In the year as a whole, GDP grew by an estimated 1.7 per cent.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The production of this forecast is supported by the Institute's Corporate Members: Arcadia Group plc, Bank of England, Barclays Bank plc, Dixons plc, Ernst and Young LLP, GlaxoSmithKline, INVESCO Europe Ltd, Marks and Spencer plc, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (Europe) Ltd, Morley Fund Management, The National Grid Company plc, Nomura Research Institute Europe Ltd, Pearson plc, Rio Tinto plc, Standard Chartered Bank, UBS Warburg, Unilever plc and Watson Wyatt LLP.

References

Notes

1 National Institute Economic Review, October 2001, page 46.

2 National Institute Economic Review, April 2002, page 44.

3 Details of all simulations available on request.

4 The Financial Services Authority make this additional assumption in their analysis of house prices and their impact on the economy in their Financial Risk Outlook 2003.