Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:26:15.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospects for the UK Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Simon Kirby ,
Ray Barrell  and
Nathan Foley-Fisher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The preliminary estimate of GDP confirms that the UK economy finally stopped contracting in the fourth quarter of 2009, bringing to an end six quarters of continuous contraction (figure 1) but 0.1 per cent growth is disappointing. The estimate suggested that the economy contracted by 4.8 per cent in 2009. Growth was driven by the distribution and government sectors. The main contributors from the distribution sector were the retail and motor trades. This is consistent with the impact of the cut in the standard rate of VAT and the car scrappage scheme, both of which should have brought durables purchases forward into the last quarter of 2009. It also highlights the risk that, as the fiscal stimulus ends, the UK economy could stall and possibly even contract for a quarter or two. As figure 1 shows, we do not expect this to happen. We expect growth of 1.1 per cent per annum this year; stronger growth is inconsistent with a household sector undergoing a period of retrenchment and increased savings. Contributions to economic growth are expected to be the result of the inventory cycle and the influence of net trade.

Type
The UK Economy
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 211 , January 2010 , pp. F43 - F62
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

R., Barrell, Guillemineau, C. and Holland, D. (2007), ‘Decomposing growth in France, Germany and the United Kingdom using growth accounting and production function approaches’, National Institute Economic Review, 199, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
R., Barrell, Holland, D. and Hurst, A.I. (2008), ‘Sustainable adjustment of global imbalances’, in Åslund, A. and Dbrowski, M. (eds), Challenges of Globalization: Macroeconomic Imbalances and Development Models, Washington, Peterson Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Hurst, I. and Kirby, S. (2009), ‘How to pay for the crisis or macroeconomic implications of pension reform’, NIESR Discussion paper no. 333.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Hurst, A.I., and Mitchell, J. (2009), ‘Uncertainty bounds for cyclically adjusted budget balances’, in Larch, M. and Martins, L.N. (eds), Fiscal Policy Making in the European Union: an assessment of current practice and challenges, London, Routledge, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Kirby, S. (2009), ‘Fiscal sustainability’, National Institute Economic Review, 208, pp. 61–5.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Weale, M. (2009), ‘Fiscal policy, fairness between generations and national saving’, NIESR Discussion paper no. 338, and Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Winter.Google Scholar
Treasury, HM (2009) End of Year Fiscal Report.Google Scholar
Sefton, J. and Weale, M. (1995) Reconciliation of National Income and Expenditure: balanced estimates of income for the United Kingdom, 1920–1990, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar