Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:53:26.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-Compulsory Education in England: Choices and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Claudia Hupkau ,
Sandra McNally ,
Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela  and
Guglielmo Ventura
Claudia Hupkau*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics Centre for Vocational Education Research and Centre for Economic Performance
Sandra McNally*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics Centre for Vocational Education Research and Centre for Economic Performance and University of Surrey
Guglielmo Ventura*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics Centre for Vocational Education Research and Centre for Economic Performance
*
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most students do not follow the ‘academic track’ (i.e. A-levels) after leaving school and only about a third of students go to university before the age of 20. Yet progression routes for the majority that do not take this path but opt for vocational post-compulsory education are not as well-known, which partly has to do with the complexity of the vocational education system and the difficulty of deciphering available data. If we are to tackle long-standing problems of low social mobility and a long tail of underachievers, it is essential that post-16 vocational options come under proper scrutiny. This paper is a step in that direction.

We use linked administrative data to track decisions made by all students in England who left compulsory education after having undertaken the national examination – the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) – at age 16 in the year 2009/10. We track them up to the age of 21, as they progress through the education system and (for some) into the labour market. We categorise the many different types of post-16 qualifications into several broad categories and we look at the probability of achieving various educational and early labour market outcomes, conditional on the path chosen at age 17. We also take into account the influence of demographics, prior attainment and the secondary school attended. Our findings illustrate the strong inequality apparently generated by routes chosen at age 17, even whilst controlling for prior attainment and schooling up to that point

Keywords

post-16 educationprogression routesI20I28
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 240 , May 2017 , pp. R42 - R57
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

London School of Economics Centre for Vocational Education Research and Centre for Economic Performance and University of Surrey.

References

Bagaria, N., Bottini, N. and Coelho, M. (2013), ‘Human capital and growth: a focus on primary and secondary education in the UK’, in Besley, T. and Van Reenen, J. (eds), Investing for Properity: A manifesto for Growth, LSE Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Belfield, C., Crawford, C. and Sibieta, L. (2017), Long-run Comparisons of Spending per Pupil across Different Stages of Education, IFS Report. R126.Google Scholar
Bibby, D., Buscha, F., Cerqua, A., Thomson, D. and Urwin, P. (2014), ‘Estimation of the labour market returns to qualifications gained in English Further Education’, BIS Research Paper 195.Google Scholar
Bibby, D., Cerqua, A., Gould, M., Thomson, D. and Urwin, P. (2015), Further Education: Social Mobility, Skills and Second Chances, Report for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., Dearden, L. and Sianesi, B. (2005), ‘Evaluating the impact of education on earnings: models, methods and results from the NCDS’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168 (3), pp. 473–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlon, G. and Patrignani, P. (2011), ‘The long term effect of vocational qualifications on labour market outcomes’, BIS Research Paper No. 47.Google Scholar
Conlon, G. and Patrignani, P. (2013), ‘A disaggregated analysis of the long-run impact of vocational qualifications’, BIS Research Paper 106.Google Scholar
Dearden, L., McGranahan, L. and Sianesi, B. (2004), ‘An in-depth analysis of the returns to National Vocational Qualifications obtained at Level 2’, CEE Discussion Paper No.46.Google Scholar
Dearden, L., McIntosh, S., Mychk, M. and Vignoles, A. (2002), ‘The returns to academic and vocational qualifications in the UK’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 54 (3), pp. 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education (2015a), Vocational Qualifications for 16 to 19 year olds: 2017 and 2018 Performance Tables Technical Guidance for Awarding Organisations, March.Google Scholar
Department for Education (2015b), 2017 16 to 19 Performance Tables: Qualifications in the Tech Level Category, February.Google Scholar
Department for Education (2016), Post-16 Skills Plan, July, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/536043/Post-16_Skills_Plan.pdf.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. and Tominey, E. (2005), ‘The wage scare from male youth unemployment’, Labour Economics, 12 (4), pp. 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons Library (2016), NEET: Young People Not in Education, Employment or Training, http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06705.Google Scholar
Hupkau, C, McNally, S., Ruiz-Valenzuela, J. and Ventura, G. (2016), Post-Compulsory Education in England: Choices and Implications, CVERDP001, Centre for Vocational Education Research, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
McIntosh, S. (2006), ‘Further analysis of the returns to academic and vocational qualifications’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68 (2), pp. 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, S., and Morris, D. (2016), Labour Market Returns to Vocational Qualifications in the Labour Force Survey, CVERDP002, Centre for Vocational Education Research, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Musset, P. and Field, S. (2013), A Skills beyond School Review of England, OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training, OECD Publishing/OECD, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264203594-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UCAS (2016), Progression Pathways, https://www.ucas.com/sites/default/files/progression_pathways_report_final_v2_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. (2011), Review of Vocational Education: The Wolf Report, Department for Education and Department for Business Innovation and Skills, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-vocational-education-the-wolf-report.Google Scholar