Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T23:37:40.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘PLUNDERING THE LIBERAL PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION’? THE USE OR ABUSE OF ADAM SMITH IN PARLIAMENT, 1919–2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

Zachary Greene ,
Jan M. Jasinski Open the ORCID record for Jan M. Jasinski [Opens in a new window] ,
Graeme Roy ,
Thomas Schober  and
Thomas J. Scotto
Zachary Greene
Affiliation:
School of Government and Public Policy, University Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Jan M. Jasinski
Affiliation:
Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Graeme Roy*
Affiliation:
Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Thomas Schober
Affiliation:
School of Government and Public Policy, University Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Thomas J. Scotto
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
*
Corresponding author: Graeme Roy; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The contemporary relevance of Adam Smith is evidenced by continued reference to his name. Computational analysis identifies over 700 mentions of Smith and his two famous works—The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations—in post-World War 1 House of Commons debates. We find some parliamentarians appreciate Smith’s complex ideas, but most references are ‘ornamental’. Charting Smith’s use over the decades, this paper builds on Kirk Willis’ idea that studying parliamentary debates are an ideal way to understand how, at best, policy ideas, germinate and disseminate over time, or, at worst, how ‘complex ideas became slogans’.

Keywords

Adam SmithHansardparliamentary debateshistory of economic thoughtparliamentary speechesornamentalismWealth of NationsA1B2B12B310
Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 265: Special issue: "ADAM SMITH@300" , Autumn 2023 , pp. 144 - 156
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute Economic Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S. and Matsuo, A. (2018), ‘Quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data’, Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 30), p. 774. doi:10.21105/joss.00774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevins, A. (1995), Tories rocked as senior MP Alan Howarth defects to Labour. The Guardian, available online at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/1995/oct/08/uk.anthonybevins, retrieved on 18 July 2023.Google Scholar
Cairney, P. (2016), The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making, Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, J.M., Douglas, P.H. and Hollander, J.H. (1928), Adam Smith, 1776–1926: Lectures to Commemorate the Sesquicentennial of the Publication of ‘The Wealth of Nations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, M. (2021), ‘The webs of belief around ‘evidence’ in legislatures: The case of select committees the UK House of Commons’, Public Administration, 99, 1, pp. 40–54. doi:10.1111/padm.12687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, Jr R. D. (1979), Mrs. Thatcher’s right-wing guru. The New York Times, p. F7.Google Scholar
Liu, G.M. (2022), Adam Smith’s America How a Scottish Philosopher Became An Icon of American Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Muldoon, J., Gould, A. M. and Yonai, D. K. (2022), Conjuring-up a bad guy: The academy’s Straw-Manning of Milton Friedman’s perspective of corporate social responsibility and its consequences. The American Economist. doi:10.1177/05694345221145008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, J. (2019), Adam Smith: What He Thought, and Why It Matters. London, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Osnabrügge, M., Hobolt, S. B. and Rodon, T. (2021), ‘Playing to the gallery: Emotive rhetoric in parliaments’, American Political Science Review, 115, 3, pp. 885–99. doi:10.1017/s0003055421000356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. (1927), ‘Adam Smith and Laissez Faire’, Journal of Political Economy, 35, 2, pp. 198–232. doi:10.1086/253837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H. (2022), rvest (Version 1.0.3), available online at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rvest/index.html.Google Scholar
Willis, K. (1979), ‘The role in Parliament of the economic ideas of Adam Smith, 1776–1800’, History of Political Economy, 11, 4, pp. 505–44. doi:10.1215/00182702-11-4-505CrossRefGoogle Scholar