Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:27:36.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Measures of Workforce Skills in the EU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Lili Kang ,
Mary O'Mahony  and
Fei Peng
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents new data series designed to yield a more complete picture of the growth in average skill levels embedded in the EU workforce, comparing with competitor countries such as the US and China. Harmonised data from EU surveys are employed to extend coverage in existing databases to more countries, to cover the period of the financial crisis, and to skills acquired through informal workforce training. The results indicate growth in labour quality in the EU15 marginally below the US, convergence of the group of new member states to the EU15 but no sign of convergence of China to more developed regions. There is evidence of a pronounced rise in labour quality in most countries after 2007, consistent with theories of labour hoarding, but with some notable exceptions. Expanding the conventional measures of labour quality to include informal training leads to small but significant increases in the growth of human capital in some EU15 member states.

Keywords

Workforce skillstrainingfinancial crisis
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 220 , April 2012 , pp. R17 - R28
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors acknowledge helpful comments from colleagues at Birmingham and two referees. This research was undertaken as part of the INDICSER project, funded by the European Commission, Research Directorate General, as part of the 7th Framework Programme, Theme 8: Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities, Grant Agreement no. 244709.

References

Barslund, M., (2012), “Recent developments in selected education indicators and their relation to Europe 2020 targets?’, National Institute Economic Review, 220, April, pp. 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J.Spiegel, M., (1994), “The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data?’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 34 (2), pp. 143–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrado, C.A.Hulten, C.R.Sichel, D., (2005), “Measuring capital and technology: an expanded framework?’, in Corrado, C.Haltiwanger, J.Sichel, D. (eds), Measuring Capital in the New Economy, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 65, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrado, C.A.Hulten, C.R.Sichel, D., (2009), “Intangible capital and US economic growth?’, The Review of Income and Wealth, 55 (3), pp. 661–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukao, K.Sumio, H.Tsutomu, M.Konomi, T., (2009), “Intangible investment in Japan: measurement and contribution to economic growth?’, Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), pp. 717–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O., (2004), “From physical to human capital accumulation: inequality and the process of development?’, The Review of Economic Studies, 71 (4), pp. 1001–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E.L.La Porta, R.Lopez-de-Silanes, F.Shleifer, A., (2004), “Do institutions cause growth?’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (3), pp. 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgio-Marrano, M.Haskel, J.Wallis, G., (2009), “What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment and Britain's productivity record revisited?’, Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), pp. 686–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E.J., (1988). “On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalava, J.Aulin-Amhavarra, P.Alanen, A., (2007), ‘Intangible capital in the Finnish business sector, 1975–2005?’, ETLA – The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, discussion paper no. 1103.Google Scholar
Jona-Lasinio, C.Iommi, M.Roth, F., (2009), ‘Report on gathering information and estimations for the Innodrive project – macro approach?’, mimeo, Innodrive project.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W.Fraumeni, B., (1992), “The output of the education sector?’, in Griliches, Z. (ed.), Output Measurement in the Services Sector, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W.Gollop, F.M.Fraumeni, B., (1987), Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Economic Studies.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W.Ho, M.S.Stiroh, K.J., (2005), Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kang, L., (2012), ‘Essays on human capital and productivity analysis in China?’, PhD Thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Kang, L.Peng, F., (forthcoming), ‘A selection analysis on education returns in China’, Post-Communist Economics.Google Scholar
Mason, G.Barrell, R.Fic, T.Holland, D.Liadze, I.Maimaiti, Y.O'Mahony, M.Peng, F.Riley, R.Rincon, A.Whitworth, R., (2012), ‘Macroeconomic benefits of vocational education and training?’, Draft final report to CEDEFOP, mimeo, NIESR.Google Scholar
Oi, W., (1962), “Labour as a quasi-fixed factor?’, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 6, pp. 538–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, M., (2012), ‘Human capital formation and continuous training: evidence For EU countries?’, Review of Income and Wealth,Google Scholar
O'Mahony, M.Timmer, M.P., (2009), “Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: the EU KLEMS Database?’, The Economic Journal, 119 (538), F374–F403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rooijen-Horsten, M.van den Bergen, D.Tanriseven, M., (2008), ‘Intangible capital in the Netherlands: a benchmark?’, Statistics Netherlands, Discussion paper no. 08001.Google Scholar