Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:07:45.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maintaining Stable Macroeconomic Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Russell Jones*
Affiliation:
Llewellyn Consulting
John Llewellyn*
Affiliation:
Llewellyn Consulting

Executive summary

The UK economy faces more than usually uncertain times. Outside the European Union, and in an increasingly challenging global environment characterised by ageing populations, climate change, populism, protectionism, and more, the country needs to chart a new course. This may well require policymakers to consider unconventional approaches to monetary and fiscal policy and, at the very least argues for important modifications of the current policy regime, including the autonomous mandate of the Bank of England.

At some point, there will be a major slowdown in economic activity. Yet the Bank of England has very little leeway to respond by cutting interest rates, and it has already adopted an armoury of unorthodox tools that may be decreasing in effectiveness. More radical monetary approaches would be likely to be politically controversial; and are not without risks. In these circumstances it would be a mistake to rely solely, or even largely, on monetary policy to maintain demand. It would be better to conduct monetary and fiscal policy in tandem, and for discretionary fiscal policy to be required to play a much more active role in demand management than hitherto. This would, for example, imply major extension of the automatic stabilisers and efforts better to calibrate discretionary initiatives with the business cycle.

But given the long-term pressures on the public finances, more fundamental changes in the structure of spending and taxation are needed, along with a redrawing of fiscal rules and targets, under independent budgetary oversight. The current, historically low, share in GDP of public spending is itself unsustainable in light of the demand for services of an ageing population; plans should be made to raise it closer to the European average. In the most extreme circumstances it might become necessary to waive the fiscal rules entirely and for the Bank of England directly to underwrite fiscal stimulus in order to sustain aggregate demand. It would be wise for the authorities to consider the options in detail now, while the environment is still relatively stable.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper has benefited from significant and substantive comments from Martin Wolf (Financial Times) and Rhys Bidder (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco). The views, judgements and policy proposals expressed in this chapter are those of the authors, but not necessarily those of the critical commentators, Gatehouse Advisory Partners, Llewellyn Consulting, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

References

Crafts, N. and Mills, C. (2019), ‘Is the UK productivity slowdown unprecedented?’, Universities of Warwick and Loughborough. July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolls, M., Fuest, C. and Peichl, A. (2009), ‘Automatic stabilisers and economic crisis: US vs. Europe’, IZA Discussion Paper no. 4310, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (2018), ‘Britain's tax system is an inefficient mess’, Financial Times, 13 August.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2015), ‘Nothing to fear but fear itself?’, Llewellyn Consulting Comment, 26 February.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2016), ‘Over the boundary’, Llewellyn Consulting Comment, 28 June.Google Scholar