Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:16:11.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation and the Skill Mix: Chemicals and Engineering in Britain and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Geoff Mason  and
Karin Wagner
Geoff Mason
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Karin Wagner
Affiliation:
Social Science Research Centre, Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years continued disparities between countries in economic performance combined with the rapid pace of technological change have led to growing interest in comparisons of ‘national systems of innovation’. The development of this concept reflects increased awareness of both the cumulative, informal nature of much innovative activity—especially the interaction between producers and prospective users of new products—and the ways in which national-institutional structures condition the decisions taken by key actors in the innovative process such as enterprises, universities, and individual engineers, scientists and other members of the labour force (Lundvall, 1988; Freeman, 1988; Westney, 1993; Soskice, 1993).

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 148 , May 1994 , pp. 61 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

This note draws on work published in National Institute Report no. 6, High-level Skills and Industrial Competitiveness: Post-graduate Engineers and Scientists in Britain and Germany, 1994. We are glad to acknowledge financial support for this enquiry which was provided by the Science and Engineering Research Council together with the Economic and Social Research Council; however, they are not responsible in anyway for the views expressed in this note.

References

Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1993), ‘Innovation and R&D spillovers’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 865, December.Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. and Vivarelli, M. (1994), ‘Small firms and R&D spillovers: evidence from Italy’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 927, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, H., Rogers, P. and Bond, R. (1990), Research in the United Kingdom, France and West Germany: A Comparison, SERC, Swindon.Google Scholar
Bartel, A. and Lichtenberg, F. (1987), ‘The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology’, The Review of Economic and Statistics, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesarbeitgeberverband Chemie, AT-Angestellte, Leitende Angestellte, Akademiker und Fachhochschulabsolventen in der Chemischen Industrie, Wiesbaden, 1991.Google Scholar
Centre for Exploitation of Science and Technology (CEST) (1991), Attitudes to Innovation in Germany and Britain: a Comparison, London.Google Scholar
Chemical Industries Association (1990-93), Graduate Recruitment Surveys, London.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1989), ‘Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, A., Hitchens, D. and Wagner, K. (1985), ‘Productivity, machinery and skills in a sample of British and German manufacturing plants’, National Institute Economic Review, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engineering Industry Training Board (EITB) (1989), British Engineering: Employment, Training and Education, Watford.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. (1988), ‘International competitiveness’, Economic Journal, vol. 98, June.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (1988), ‘Japan: a new national system of innovation?’, in G Dosi et al (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (1992), Statistik der Chemiestudiengänge in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1991, Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar
HMSO (1993), Realising our Potential: a Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology, London.Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. (1988), ‘Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation’, in G Dosi et al (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Mason, G., van Ark, B. and Wagner, K. (1994), ‘Productivity, product quality and workforce skills: food processing in four European countries’, National Institute Economic Review, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G. and Wagner, K. (1994), High-level Skills and Industrial Competitiveness: Post-graduate Engineers and Scientists in Britain and Germany, National Institute Report no. 6, London.Google Scholar
Narin, F. and Olivastro, D. (1992), ‘Status report: linkage between technology and science’, Research Policy, vol. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (1992a), ‘Productivity levels in British and German manufacturing industry’, National Institute Economic Review, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (1992b), ‘Productivity and human capital formation in UK and German manufacturing’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 28.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (1993), ‘Workforce skills and export competitiveness: an Anglo-German comparison’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 47.Google Scholar
Prais, S. (1981), Vocational qualifications of the labour force in Britain and Germany, National Institute Economic Review, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prais, S. and Wagner, K. (1988), ‘Productivity and management: the training of foremen in Britain and Germany’, National Institute Economic Review, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1987), ‘The elements of British technological competitiveness’, National Institute Economic Review, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1989), ‘A comparison of technological activities in West Germany and the United Kingdom’, National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review, May.Google Scholar
Soskice, D. (1993), ‘Product market and innovation strategies of companies and their implications for enterprise tenure: a comparative institutional approach to some cross-country differences’, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin, (mimeo), November.Google Scholar
Steedman, H., Mason, G. and Wagner, K. (1991), ‘Intermediate skills in the workplace: deployment, standards and supply in Britain, France and Germany’, National Institute Economic Review, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. and Wagner, K. (1987), ‘A second look at productivity, machinery and skills in Britain and Germany’, National Institute Economic Review, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. and Wagner, K. (1989), ‘Productivity, machinery and skills: clothing manufacture in Britain and Germany’, National Institute Economic Review, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau (VDMA) (1988), Ingenieur-Erhebung im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau 1988, Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar
Westney, E. (1993), ‘Country patterns in R&D organisation: the United States and Japan’, in B Kogut (ed), Country Competitiveness: Technology and the Organising of Work, Oxford.Google Scholar
Willinger, M. and Zuscovitch, E. (1988), ‘Towards the economics of information-intensive production systems: the case of advanced materials’, in G Dosi et al (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.Google Scholar