Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:10:08.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Forecasts Evolve - The Growth Forecasts of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

William A. Allen  and
Terence Mills
William A. Allen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School, City University
Terence Mills*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
*
e-mail: [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate how central bank forecasts of GDP growth evolve through time, and how they are adapted in the light of official estimates of actual GDP growth. Using data for 1988–2005, we find that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has typically adjusted its forecast for growth over the coming four quarters by about a third of the unexpected component of estimated growth in the four quarters most recently ended. We were unable to find any clear signs of systematic errors in the FOMC's forecasts. UK data for 1998–2005 suggest that the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) did not adjust its forecasts in this way, and that there were systematic forecast errors, but the evidence from the latter part of the period 2001–5 tentatively shows a behaviour pattern closer to that of the FOMC, with no clear signs of systematic errors.

Keywords

Forecastsmonetary policydata revisionsvintagesFederal ReserveFederal Open Market CommitteeBank of England, Monetary Policy CommitteeE47E58N12N14
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 193 , July 2005 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very grateful to those who commented on earlier versions of the paper, including Charles Goodhart, Geoffrey Wood and an anonymous referee. Of course, they don't necessarily agree with our conclusions.

References

Bank of England (2004), Inflation Report, August, pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
Britton, E., Fisher, P. and Whitley, J. (1998), ‘The Inflation Report projections: understanding the fan chart’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, February.Google Scholar
Castle, J. and Ellis, C. (2002), ‘Building a real time database for GDP(E)’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Spring, pp. 42–49.Google Scholar
Clements, M.P. (2005), Evaluating Econometric Forecasts of Economic and Financial Variables, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1998), Forecasting Economic Time Series, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croushore, D. and Stark, T. (1999), ‘A real-time data set for macroeconomists’, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Reserve Board (2004), Monetary Policy Report submitted to the Congress on July 20, 2004, pursuant to section 2B of the Federal Reserve Act. Available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/2004/july/ReportSection1.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Lords (2004), 3rd Report of Session 2003-04: Monetary and Fiscal Policy: Present Successes and Future Problems Volume 1 - Report, HL Paper 176-I, paragraph 46.Google Scholar
Mills, T.C. and Pepper, G.T. (1999), ‘Assessing the forecasters: an analysis of the forecasting records of the Treasury, the London Business School and the National Institute’, International Journal of Forecasting, 15, pp. 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, N. (1994), ‘Cointegration and forecast evaluation: some lessons from National Institute forecasts’, Journal of Forecasting, 13, pp. 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, G.T. (1998), Inside Thatcher's Monetarist Revolution, Macmillan/Institute of Economic Affairs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar