Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:22:48.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Indecision to Fast-Track Privatisations: Can Greece Still do it?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Nicos Christodoulakis
Nicos Christodoulakis*
Affiliation:
Athens University of Economics and Business, Department of International and European Economic Studies
*
e-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explains how the collapse of growth after 2008, in combination with soaring public and external deficits, led to the escalation of Greek debt, while the government's delay in responding to the crisis increased the cost of borrowing and necessitated the bail-out agreement with the IMF and the European Union. One year later, Greece is struggling to harness fiscal deficits amidst a deep recession and rising social tension. Debt sustainability has not yet been ensured and another tranche of loans has been negotiated under new terms and conditions, including higher taxes and extensive privatisations of public companies and property. The paper discusses the main failures of the bail-out agreement and why the lack of growth so far has undermined efforts at stabilisation. As an alternative, the paper suggests that with a modest return to growth, combined with fast-track privatisations, the prospects of debt sustainability improve substantially. In light of the recent debate on the European Stability Mechanism, the paper suggests that the bail-out facility should avoid the debt seniority condition, so that Greece could return to normal market borrowing after 2013 without raising new fears of ‘haircuts’ on private sector obligations.

Keywords

Debtfiscal policyGreeceH60H61
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 217 , July 2011 , pp. R60 - R74
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

I have benefited from various comments in seminars at the LSE Workshop on Greece organised by the Hellenic Observatory in November 2010, and from the AUEB-DIEES Research Day, in June 2011, where an earlier version of the paper was presented. Proposals on how to deal with the Greek debt and views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not implicate or represent any other person or organisation.

References

Alexopoulou, I., Bunda, I. and Ferrando, A. (2009), ‘Determinants of government bond spreads in new EU countries’, ECB Working Paper Series No. 1093.Google Scholar
Attinasi, M., Checherita, C. and Nickel, C. (2009), ‘What explains the surge in euro area sovereign spreads during the financial crisis of 2007-09?’, ECB Working Paper Series No. 1131.Google Scholar
Barrios, S., Iversen, P., Lewandowska, M. and Setzer, R. (2009), ‘Determinants of intra-euro area government bond spreads during the financial crisis’, European Economy, Economic Papers 388.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Giavazzi, F. (2002), ‘Current account deficits in the Euro Area: the end of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle?’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 33(2002-2), pp. 147–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, L. and Gulati, M. (2011), ‘Greek debt - the endgame scenarios’, Mimeo, April.Google Scholar
Christodoulakis, N. (2009), ‘Ten years of EMU: convergence, divergence and new priorities’, National Institute Economic Review, 208, pp. 86–100.10.1177/0027950109338653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulakis, N. (2010), ‘Crisis, threats and ways out for the Greek economy’, Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 4, I, pp. 89–96, June.Google Scholar
Christodoulakis, N. (2011), ‘Market reforms in Greece 1990-2008: domestic limitations and external discipline’, in Kalyvas, S. and Pagoulatos, G. (eds), Market Reforms in Greece, Columbia University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Christodoulakis, N. and Sarantides, V. (2011), ‘External asymmetries in the euro area and the role of foreign direct investment’, Bank of Greece, Discussion paper.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. (2010), ‘The Greek crisis and the future of the Eurozone’, Intereconomics, 2, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009), Quarterly Report on the Euro area, 8(1), Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council (2010), Conclusions, Annex II, Brussels, December.Google Scholar
Gulati, M. and Buchheit, L. (2010), ‘How to restructure Greek debt’, Duke Law Working Papers, No. 47.Google Scholar
Lachman, D. (2010), ‘Greece's threat to the euro’, Intereconomics, 2, pp. 93–5.Google Scholar
Mabbett, D. and Schelkle, W. (2010), ‘Beyond the crisis - the Greek conundrum and EMU reform’, Intereconomics, 2, pp. 81–5.Google Scholar
Pesaran, H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. (1999), ‘Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 446, pp. 621–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, F., Nowak-Lehmann, D. and Otter, Th. (2011), ‘Has the financial crisis shattered citizens’ trust in national and European governmental institution?’, CEPS Working Document No. 343, Brussels.Google Scholar
Shelburne, R.C. (2008), ‘Current account deficits in European emerging markets’, UN Discussion Paper, No. 2008.2.Google Scholar
Skouras, S. and Christodoulakis, N. (2011), ‘Electoral misgovernance cycles: evidence from wildfires and tax evasion in Greece and elsewhere’, LSE, Hellenic Observatory, GreeSE Paper No 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehrkamp, R. (2011), ‘Who's next? The Eurozone in an insolvency trap’, Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2.Google Scholar
Zsolt, D., Pisani-Ferry, J. and Sapir, A. (2011), ‘A comprehensive approach to the euro-area debt crisis’, Bruegel, Policy brief, No. 2.Google Scholar