No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fiscal Policy in the Longer Term
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2020
Extract
Governments are important players in many parts of the economy, and at present perhaps the most visible is the balance they set between taxing and spending. Tax and spending polices are in part designed to redistribute resources between individuals, but they can also be used to redistribute resources over time. Governments can also use tax and spending policies to sustain or restrain economic activity, and in most countries a case can be made for using active fiscal policy in periods of clear economic distress, or in periods when it would be useful to restrain imbalances that can lead to financial crises. As a result it is difficult to gauge the appropriate stance of policy. Short-run problems have to be balanced against longer-term needs, and mistakes are common. In the UK, for instance, in the six years up until 2008 the balance of policy was perhaps too loose, whilst over the next five years it is probably too tight, even though deficits are projected to be higher than they were before 2009.
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2011 National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Footnotes
∗
I would like to thank Jonathan Portes, Dawn Holland and Simon Kirby for their comments. Any errors remain mine.
References
Alesina, A. and Perrotti, R. (1995), ‘Fiscal expansions and adjustments in OECD economies’, Economic Policy, 21, pp. 207–47.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A.J. (2011), ‘Long-term fiscal sustainability in major economies’, Bank for International Settlements Working Paper, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R. (2011), ‘Fiscal consolidation and the slimmer state’, National Institute Economic Review, 215, January, pp. F4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R. (2011a), ‘Long-term fiscal prospects: comment on Auerbach’, Bank for International Settlements Working Paper, July.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Fic, T. and Liadze, I. (2009), ‘Fiscal policy effectiveness in the banking crisis’, National Institute Economic Review, 207, January, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R., Holland, D. and Hurst, A.I. (2011), ‘Fiscal multipliers and fiscal consolidations’, OECD Working Paper.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Holland, D. and Liadze, I. (2011), ‘Accounting for UK economic performance 1973-2009, National Institute Discussion Paper no 359. Forthcoming in a European Commission book on the UK economy published in September 2011.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Hurst, A.I. and Mitchell, J. (2007), ‘Uncertainty bounds for cyclically adjusted budget balances’, in Larch, M. and Martins, L.N. (eds), Fiscal Indicators, Brussels, European Commission, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Kirby, S. (2011), ‘Trend output and the output gap’, National Institute Economic Review, 215, January, pp. F63–74.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Kirby, S. and Orazgani, A. (2011), ‘The macroeconomic impact from extending working lives’, Department for Work and Pensions Economics Paper no. 95.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Weale, M. (2010), ‘Fiscal policy, fairness between generations and national saving’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 338, and Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Spring.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D., Sefton, J. and Weale, M. (2011), ‘Generational accounts for the United Kingdom’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 377.Google Scholar
OECD (2011), ‘Pensions at a glance 2011: retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries’, www.oecd.org/els/social/pensions/PAG.Google Scholar
Perrotti, R. (2011), ‘The “Austerity Myth”: gain without pain?’, Bank for International Settlements Working Paper, July.Google Scholar
Wyplosz, C. (2005), ‘Fiscal policy: institutions versus rules’, National Institute Economic Review, 191, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar