Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:17:25.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolution of Financial Structure in the G-7 Over 1997–2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Abstract

As background for this special issue of the Review, this article provides an overview of recent developments in financial structure in the major industrial countries using national flow of funds balance sheet data. We focus in particular on changes in the size and composition of the balance sheet for the major sectors — households, companies, general government, foreign and financial as well as banks and institutional investors separately. Two recent subperiods are distinguished, namely the ‘great moderation’ of high growth and low inflation from roughly 1997–2006 and then the crisis period 2007–10. We discern elements of convergence — notably in corporate leverage — but also some continuing contrasts — such as household debt — between market- and bank-dominated financial systems, while highlighting that short-run changes arising from the conjuncture may blur longer-term trends in financial structure. Looking ahead, the data highlight common challenges from public and household debt, albeit to an extent that varies markedly between countries. Bank deleveraging and recapitalisation appear slow, while a subsector including shadow banks continues to grow except in the US. There are contrasts between France and Italy on the one hand and Germany on the other which underline the vulnerability of the former in the ongoing Euro Area crisis.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

National Institute of Economic and Social Research. E-mail: [email protected]. I thank Olivier de Bandt, Adeline Bachellerie and Franck Sédillot for help in obtaining data, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

Armstrong, A. (2012), ‘UK household rebalancing’, National Institute Economic Review, 220, F49.Google Scholar
Bank of Canada (2011), Financial System Review December 2011, Bank of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R.Davis, E.P. (2008), ‘The evolution of the financial crisis of 2007–8’, National Institute Economic Review, 206, pp. 514.Google Scholar
Be Duc, L.Le Breton, G. (2009), ‘Flow of funds analysis at the ECB, framework and applications’, ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 105.Google Scholar
Berry, S.Corder, M.Williams, R. (2012), ‘What might be driving the need to rebalance in the United Kingdom’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 52/1.Google Scholar
Byrne, J.Davis, E.P. (2003), Financial Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. (1999), ‘Institutionalisation and EMU: implications for European Financial Markets’, International Finance, 2, pp. 3361.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P. (2004), ‘Is there a pensions crisis in the UK?’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 2004/3, pp. 343370.Google Scholar
Davis, E.P.Karim, D. (2011), ‘Policy efficacy in the crisis, exit strategies and the return of growth’ in Giudice, G.Kuenzel, R.Springbett, T. (eds), UK Economy: The Crisis in Perspective, European Commission, Routledge.Google Scholar
Delamarre, F. (2011), ‘Strengths and limitations of the French financial accounts for analysis of the last financial crisis from a macroeconomic viewpoint’, background paper for IMF/OECD conference “Strengthening sectoral position and flow data in the macroeconomic accounts”, February-March 2011.Google Scholar
ECB (2011), ‘The financial crisis in the light of the euro area accounts; a flow of funds perspective’, ECB Monthly Bulletin, October 2011, 99–120, European Central Bank.Google Scholar
Roe, A. (2003), ‘Asymmetries between rich and poor countries in financial crisis responses — the need for a flow-of-funds approach’, Economic Systems Research, 15, pp. 233–57.Google Scholar