Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:54:17.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Domestic Performance of UK Multinational Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Sourafel Girma
Sourafel Girma*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Leicester
*
e-mails: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the domestic performance of UK multinational firms from two perspectives: (i) their productivity relative to foreign multinationals, domestic exporters and non-exporters, and (ii) their ability to benefit newly acquired affiliates. Nonparametric analysis shows that the productivity distribution of UK multinationals is dominated by their foreign counterparts (especially US firms), and quantile regressions reveal that the performance disadvantage of UK multinationals is more pronounced at the higher end of the productivity distribution. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, it is found that, unlike foreign acquisitions, take-overs of domestic non-exporting firms by UK multinationals do not appear to lead to any productivity improvements.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 185 , July 2003 , pp. 78 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

I wish to thank an anonymous referee for some useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I also wish to acknowledge the support of Martin Weale.

References

Bartelman, E.J. and Doms, M. (2000), ‘Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, pp. 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvignati, A.M. (1987), ‘Domestic profit advantages of multinational firms’, Journal of Business, 60, pp. 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. and Jensen, J. (1997), ‘Exceptional exporters performance: cause, effect or both?’, Journal of International Economics, 47, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunerhjelm, P. (1996), ‘The relation between firm-specific intangibles and exports’, Economic Letters, 53, pp. 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchinski, M. (1998), ‘Recent advances in quantile regression models’, Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 88–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1976), The future of the Multinational Enterprise, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, R.E. (1971), ‘International comparisons: the industrial economics of foreign investment’, Economica, 38, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clerides, S., Lach, S. and Tybout, J. (1998), ‘Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Columbia, Mexico and Morocco’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXIII, pp. 903–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1989), ‘Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, W.J. (1999), Practical Nonparametric Statistics, New York, John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
Conyon, M.J., Girma, S., Thompson, S. and Wright, P.W (2001), ‘The productivity and wage effects of foreign acquisition in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Industrial Economics, L, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, C. and Martin, R. (2002), ‘Multinationals, foreign ownership and productivity in UK businesses’, Mimeo, Centre for Research into Business Activity, ONS.Google Scholar
Delgano, M.A., Farinas, J.C. and Sonia, R (2002), ‘Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach’, Journal of International Economics, 57, pp. 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, A.P., Gibson, H.E. and Tsakalotos, E. (1997), ‘The impact of acquisition on company performance: evidence from a large panel of UK firms’, Oxford Economic Papers, 49, pp. 344–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doms, M.E. and. Jensen, J.B. (1998), ‘Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States’, in Baldwin, R., Lipsey, R. and Richardson, J.D. (eds), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, J.H. (1977), ‘Trade, location of economic activity and MNE: a search for an eclectic approach’, in Ohlin, B., Hesselborn, P.O. and Wijkman, P.M. (eds), The international allocation of economic activity, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Girma, S., Greenaway, D. and Kneller, R. (2002), ‘Exporting and productivity: a microeconometric analysis of matched firms’, GEP Working Paper, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Girma, S., Greenaway, D. and Wakelin, K. (2001), ‘Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK?’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48, pp. 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girma, S., Kneller, R. and Pisu, M. (2003), ‘Exports versus FDI: an empirical test’, mimeo, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Grant, R.M. (1987), ‘Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies’, Journal of International Business Studies, 18, pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.M., Jammine, J.P. and Thomas, H. (1988), ‘Diversity, diversification and profitability among British manufacturing companies’, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 767–798.Google Scholar
Greniger, J.M., Beamish, P.W. and da Costas, R.C. (1989), ‘Diversification strategy and internalization: implication for MNE performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 109–119.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. and Simpson, H. (2002), ‘Characteristics of foreign-owned firms in British manufacturing’, in Blundell, R., Card, D. and Freeman, R. (eds), Creating a Premier League Economy, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gomes, L. and Ramaswamy, K. (1999), ‘An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance’, Journal of International Business Studies, 30, pp. 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, K.C and Lee, S.H. (1998), ‘Multinationality and firm performance’, Multinational Business Review, 6, pp. 63–70.Google Scholar
Harris, R. and Robinson, C. (2002), ‘The effect of foreign acquisitions on total factor productivity: plant-level evidence from UK manufacturing, 1987-1992’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, pp. 562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. (1984), ‘Specification tests for the multinomial logit model’, Econometrica, 52, pp. 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, K., Ries, J. and Swenson, D. (1995), ‘Agglomeration benefits and location choice: evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States’, Journal of International Economics, 39, pp. 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J. (1978), ‘Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system’, Econometrica, 46, pp. 931–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Kim, H. (1997), ‘International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product diversified firms’, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 767–798.Google Scholar
Hymer, S.H. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Boston, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. (1986), ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 76, pp. 323–329.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. (1969), American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978), ‘Regression quantiles’, Econometrica, 50, pp. 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. (1985), ‘Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility’, Sloan Management Review, 26, pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
Kumar, M.S. (1984), Growth Acquisition and Investment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mathur, I., Singh, M. and Kinberly, C.G. (2001), ‘The evidence from Canadian firms on multinational diversification and performance’, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41, pp. 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mélitz, M.J (2000), ‘Estimating firm-level productivity in differentiated product industries’, mimeo, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. (1994), ‘Natural and quasi-experiments in economics’, NBER Technical Working Paper No. 170.Google Scholar
Palepu, K.G. (1986), ‘Predicting takeover targets: a methodological and empirical analysis’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8, pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A.M. (1974), ‘Motivation for foreign investment: the market imperfections and risk diversification hypotheses’, Journal of World Trade Law, 9, pp. 567–673.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. (1983), ‘Entry, exit and the theory of multinational corporation, in Kindleberger, C. and Audretsch, D. (eds), The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Summers, L.H. (1988), ‘Breach of trust in hostile takeovers’, in Auerbach, A.J. (ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequence, Chicago, NBER.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1988), ‘Value maximization and the acquisition process’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, pp. 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, F and Verbeek, M. (1999), ‘Estimating and interpreting models with endogenous treatment effects’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17, pp. 473–478.Google Scholar