Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:14:57.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Danish Labour Market Activation Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Jon Kvist  and
Lisbeth Pedersen
Jon Kvist*
Affiliation:
SFI - Danish National Centre for Social Research
Lisbeth Pedersen
Affiliation:
SFI - Danish National Centre for Social Research
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under the heading of flexicurity, Danish labour market activation policies are receiving international attention because of their perceived ability both to curb unemployment and to boost employment. Indeed, the objectives, target groups and design of activation policy have undergone a remarkable transformation over the past fifteen years. From the initial curbing of unemployment among the insured unemployed through standard activation offers, the aim today is also to increase labour supply among non-economic active groups using individually tailored programmes. Danish activation policies thus embrace not only active labour market policies but also social and integration policies. Despite widespread popularity and belief in the positive effects of activation, little is actually known about its overall impact on the Danish economy.

Keywords

Activation policiesflexicurityemployment effectsDenmarkJ60J68
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 202 , October 2007 , pp. 99 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, H.B. (2002), Kontanthjælpmodtageres aktivering og arbejdsudbud, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Bach, H.B. and Petersen, K.N. (2007), Kontanthjælpmodtagere i 2006, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Bolvig, I., Jensen, P. and Rosholm, M. (2002), ‘The employment effect of active social policy in Denmark’, IZA Discussion Paper 737, Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
Beskæftigelsesministeriet (2006), Kulegravning of kontanthjælpsområdet, Copenhagen, Ministry of Employment.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. (1994), ‘Active labour market policy and unemployment - a framework for the analysis of crucial design features’, OECD Economic Studies, No. 22.Google Scholar
Carroll, E. (1999), Emergence and Structuring of Social Insurance Institutions, Stockholm, Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Christensen, T.Q. (2002), Cost-effect-analyser på den aktive socialpolitik, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Det Økonomiske Råd (2007), Dansk Økonomi forår 2007, Copenhagen, Economic Council of Wise Men (DØR).Google Scholar
European Commission (2007), Towards common principles of flexicurity: more and better jobs through flexibility and security, COM (2007) 359 final.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2007a), Structural indicators. Retrieved from www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat 14 September 2007.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2007b), Public expenditures on labour market policies and employment rates retrieved from www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat 14 September 2007.Google Scholar
Filges, T., Harsl⊘f, I. and Nord-Larsen, M. (2002), Revalidering -deltagere, forl⊘b og effekter, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Geerdsen, L.P. (2002), ‘Does labour market training motivate job search?’, Working paper 23:2003, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Geerdsen, L.P. (2006), ‘Is there a threat effect of labour market programmes? A study of AMLP in the Danish UI system’, Economic Journal, 116, 513, pp. 738–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graversen, B.K. (2004), ‘Employment effects of active labour market programmes: do the programmes help welfare benefit recipients to find jobs?’, PhD thesis, Aarhus, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Graversen, B.K., Damgaard, B. and Rosdahl, A. (2007), Hurtig i gang - Evaluering of et fors⊘g med en tidlig og intensiv beskæftigelsesindsats for forsikrede ledige, Copenhagen, Danish National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Graversen, B.K. and Weise, H. (2001), ‘Effekter af aktiveringsindsatsen over for kontanthjælpsmodtagere’, Arbejdspapir 2:2001, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Hussain, M.A. and Rasmussen, M. (2007), ‘Do wage subsidies reduce ordinary employment? A firm level panel data analysis’, Working Paper, Copenhagen, Danish National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Kvist, J. (2002a), ‘Activating welfare states. How social policies can promote employment’, in Clasen, J. (ed.), What Future for Social Policy?, Bristol, Policy Press, pp. 197–210.Google Scholar
Kvist, J. (2002b), ‘Changing rights and obligations in unemployment insurance’, in Sigg, R. and Behrendt, C. (eds), Social Security in the Global Village, International Social Security Series No. 8. New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, pp. 227–45.Google Scholar
Kvist, J. (2003), ‘Scandinavian activation strategies in the 1990s: recasting social citizenship and the Scandinavian Welfare Model’, Revue Francaise des Affaires Sociales, 4, pp. 223–48.Google Scholar
Madsen, M., Filges, T., Hohnen, P., Jensen, S. and Petersen, K.N. (2007), Vil de gerne have et arbejde? Copenhagen, Danish National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Madsen, P.K. and Pedersen, L. (eds) (2003), Drìvkræfter bag arbejdsmarkedspolitikken, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Nedergaard, P. (2006), ‘Which countries learn from which? A comparative analysis of the direction of mutual learning processes within the open method of coordination committees of the European Union and among the Nordic countries’, Cooperation and Conflict, Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 41, 4, pp. 422–42.Google Scholar
Pedersen, L. (1996), Orlov, ledighed og beskæftigelse, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Pedersen, L. and S⊘ndergaard, J. (2004), ‘The role of workfare in the Scandinavian Model of Social Security: soft incentives, skill upgrading or quality of life improvement for the disadvantaged?’, in Saunders, P. (ed.), Welfare to Work in Practice, Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Statistics Denmark (2007), Statistikbanken, retrieved data from www.dst.dk 14 September 2007.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2006), Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007, Lausanne.Google Scholar