Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:17:24.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closing The UK Competitiveness Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Walter Eltis  and
David Higham
Walter Eltis
Affiliation:
Exeter College, Oxford and Department of Trade and Industry
David Higham
Affiliation:
Exeter College, Oxford and Department of Trade and Industry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is developed from the presentation given by Walter Eltis at the National Institute's seminar ‘Industrial Productivity and Competitiveness' held in London on 23 May 1995. It sets out the approach underlying the UK Government's 1994 and 1995 White Papers on competitiveness and begins by reviewing the debate on the meaning of national competitiveness. The White Papers define competitiveness as the ability to raise living standards and argue that, contrary to the views of some leading economists, competitiveness is a useful guide to policy because of the emphasis on national benchmarking. It then explains that the analytical basis of the Government's approach—which identifies ten key influences on competitiveness—lies in the theoretical and empirical analysis of economic growth (including ‘new’ growth theory) and on detailed studies of the sources of productivity differences across countries. Finally, it considers the role of privatisation, inward investment, the growth of small firms and labour market policies in improving UK performance. The paper concludes that, although three quarters of the productivity gap with French and Germany industry appears to have been closed since 1979, productivity in both manufacturing and services still lags behind those in the leading West European countries.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 154 , November 1995 , pp. 71 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

We are grateful for helpful assistance and comments from colleagues in DTI. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors.

References

Balasubramanyam, V.N. (1993), ‘Entrepreneurship and the growth of the firm: the case of the British food and drink industry’, in Brown, J. and Rose, M.B., eds., Entrepreneurship, Networks and Modern Business, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bannock, G. and Albach, H. (1991), ‘Small business policy in Europe: Britain, Germany and the EC’, Anglo-German Foundation.Google Scholar
Bean, C. and Crafts, N. (1995), ‘British Economic growth since 1945: Relative Economic Decline … and Renaissance?’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 1092.Google Scholar
Blake, A.P. and Pain, N. (1994), ‘Investigating structural changes in UK export performance: the role of innovation and direct investment’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 71.Google Scholar
Caves, R.E. (1980), ‘Productivity Differences Among Industries’, in Caves, R.E. and Krause, I.B., (eds) Britain's Economic Performance, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1993), ‘Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century’, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 6/93.Google Scholar
Competitiveness Policy Council (1993), A Competitive Strategy for America, Second Report to the President and Congress.Google Scholar
Coopers and Lybrand (1993), Final Report for study on international differences in the cost of capital for the European Commission.Google Scholar
Corden, W.M. (1994), Economic Policy, Exchange Rates and the International System, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. and Tonialo, G. (1995), ‘Post-war growth: an overview’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 1095.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.G. and Hubbard, R.G. (1994), ‘The tax sensitivity of foreign direct investment: evidence from firm-level panel data’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series no. 4703.Google Scholar
De Long, J.B. and Summers, L.H. (1991), ‘Equipment investment and economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 445–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ, Washington D.C., Brookings.Google Scholar
Denny, K. and Nickell, S. (1992), ‘Unions and investment in British industry’, Economic Journal, 102, pp. 874–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J.H. and Walker, P. (1982), ‘The competitiveness and allocative efficiency of UK manufacturing industry and foreign direct investment’, (mimeo).Google Scholar
Eltis, W. (forthcoming (1996)), ‘How low profitability and weak innovativeness undermined UK industrial growth’, Economic Journal, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukao, M. (1993), ‘International integration of financial markets and the cost of capital’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 128.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Machin, S. and Metcalf, D. (1993), ‘Signals and cycles? Productivity growth and changes in union status in British companies, 1984-89’, Economic Journal, 103, pp. 894–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hmso (1994), Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win, Cm 2563.Google Scholar
Hmso (1995), Competitiveness: Forging Ahead, Cm 2867.Google Scholar
Ibm/Lbs (1994), Made in Europe: A Four Nations Best Practice Study, November.Google Scholar
Kpmg (1995), ‘Study on Outward Investment’, study prepared for Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1994), ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession’, Foreign Affairs (March/April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, G. and van Ark, B. (1993), ‘Productivity, machinery and skills in engineering: an Anglo-Dutch comparison’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 36.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. and Zimmer, S. (1989), ‘Explaining international differences in the cost of capital: the United States and the United Kingdom versus Japan and Germany’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper 8913.Google Scholar
McKinsey (1992), Service Sector Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
Oecd (1995), Annual Economic Survey of the UK, Paris.Google Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (1995), ‘International Differences in Unit Labour Costs: a Disaggregated Study’, study prepared for the Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Owen, G. (1994), National Environment and International Competitiveness: A Comparison of the British Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industry, Foundation for Manufacturing and indusury.Google Scholar
P.A. Cambridge Economic Consultants. (1995), ‘Assessment of the Wider Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Manufacturing in the UK’, Study prepared for the Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Pain, N. (1993), ‘An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in the United Kingdom’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 40, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratten, C.F. (1976), Labour Productivity Differentials within International Companies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prais, S.J. (1981), Productivity and Industrial Structure, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P.M. (1993), ‘Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, pp. 543–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P.M. (1994), ‘The origins of endogenous growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small Business Research Centre (1993); ‘Growth innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium size firms’, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Ark, B. (1993), International Comparisons of Output and Productivity, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988), Privatisation: An Economic Analysis, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, G. (1994), ‘The influence of foreign factor prices and international taxation on fixed investment in the UK’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 66.Google Scholar