Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:22:43.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christopher Dow On Major Recessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Abstract

The National Institute had planned a seminar to mark the launch of Christopher Dow's new book Major Recessions. The seminar had to be cancelled, because Christopher Dow died a few days before it was due to be held. As some kind of substitute, the CLARE Group decided to publish this review article. The sections of the article have different authors, but they have been designed to be complementary in scope and the authors have discussed them with each other and with other members of the Group, especially A.J.C. Britton, W.J. Carlin, C.A.E. Goodhart, P.M. Oppenheimer, M.V. Posner and J.R. Sargent. The Review is pleased to give hospitality to CLARE Group articles, but is not necessarily in agreement with the views expressed.

Robin Matthews starts with some comments on the style in which, and background from which, Dow wrote this work and which concentrates on five major British recessions of the 20th century. He presents five of Dow's more general conclusions with comments. This section is followed by a review by Mike Artis of Dow's analysis of the five major recessions (1920–1, 1929–33, 1973–5, 1979–82 and 1989–92) regarded as episodes in economic history. One of Dow's main theses is that major recessions permanently reduce productive capacity. Martin Weale examines statistically his suggestion that they reduce demand by consumers whose income expectations adjust in that way — for which he finds little support. John Flemming addresses the 25 ‘golden’ postwar years without a major recession presenting a critical analysis of Dow's method of distinguishing between major and minor recessions. Matthews and Flemming consider his treatment of the question whether major recessions are inevitable, how they might be avoided, and how their effects might be mitigated. While hankering for postwar controls Dow's Keynesianism is subtle. Finally Matthews suggests an analogy with Schumpeter's Business Cycles which survived a critical review by Kuznets, Dow's treatment of his data being much more thoughtful than Schumpeter's even if some parts of his model seem rather shaky.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D.W.K. (1993), Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown break point’, Econometrica, 59, pp. 817–58.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth of the United Kingdom, Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
-(1967), Strategic Factors in Economic Development, Frank Pierce Memorial Lecture, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.C.O. (1968), ‘Why has Britain had full employment since the war?’, Economic Journal, 78, 311, September, pp. 555–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R.C.O., Feinstein, C.H. and Odling-Smee, J.E. (1982), British Economic Growth 1856-1973, Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, G. (1978), ‘Estimating the dimension of a model’, Annals of Statistics, pp. 461–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, J. and Weale, M. (1995), Reconciliation of National Income and Expenditure: Balanced Estimates of U.K. National Accounts, 1920-1990, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomou, S. and Weale, M. (1997), ‘Personal sector wealth in the United Kingdom, 1920-1965’, Review of Income and Wealth, 43, pp. 297318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. (1952), ‘Manpower’, in Worswick, G.D.N. and Ady, P.H. (eds), The British Economy 1945-50, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 223–52.Google Scholar
Wright, J.F. (1979), Britain in the Age of Economic Management: an Economic History since I939, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar