Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T17:00:02.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are Government Spending and Taxes Too High (or Too Low)?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Abstract

Arguably the biggest change in the nature even of market economies in the last hundred years has been the increase in the economic role of government. The activities and responsibilities falling under this head have varied with circumstances, but the most universal and consistent theme has been the growing prominence of government as a spender both on goods and services and on transfer payments to other economic agents. The objects o f government spending include the traditional collective products of the legal system, the civil service and the armed forces. They also include the major pillars of the welfare state—social security, health—care and education—as well as other items such as the transport and urban infrastructure, public housing and various forms of assistance to industry and agriculture. These wider objects of government expenditure are mostly popular with the electorate at large, besides being invariably supported by specific advocates and interested parties. Increases in spending are generally easier to bring about than reductions. At the same time, all these objects have to compete for approval and resources not merely with one another but with people's wish to retain as much income as possible for their own private disposition. Tax reductions are no less popular than increases in spending. This article discusses recent UK government policy towards public expenditure and taxation, and some of its impacts upon social welfare.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

(1) The government itself, or at least its printers, seem to have some difficulty remembering what is included where. In the 1996-7 Financial Statement and Budget Report, paragraph 6.73 on p.134 contradicts earlier paragraphs by stating (clearly incorrectly) that GGE(X) includes privatisation proceeds.

(2) Sales of local authority houses had begun under the preceding Labour government in the 1970s.

(3) On this and the following facts see the numerous articles on schooling, vocational training and economic performance in Britain and various continental European countries published in the Review over the past fifteen years by S.J. Prais and colleagues.

(4) Sally Prentice, ‘Health Policy and Care’ in D. Halpern et al eds. Options for Britain (Dartmouth 1996), p. 162.

(5) NHS Executive, Costing for Contracting Manual, Leeds, Department of Health 1993.