Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:39:13.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Independent Bank of England: Is that Enough

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

S.G. Hall*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Leicester
S.G.B. Henry*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Abstract

This article argues that an independent central bank is not in itself sufficient to ensure the long-term success and stability of the economy. While there are strong academic arguments for making the central bank independent, these arguments are often developed in a closed economy setting. Where trade is important and the economy is open, making the central bank independent can lead to a strategic interaction between the bank and the fiscal authorities which can produce serious imbalances in the economy over time. In particular, the analysis below suggests that there could be excess demand in the non tradable sector combined with a recession in the sectors of the economy open to trade. Our contention is that the UK economy exhibits all the signs that we would expect to see if this argument were relevant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Summers, L. (1993), ‘Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance, some comparative evidence’, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 25, 2, May, pp. 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. and Sheridan, N. (2003), ‘Does inflation targeting matter?’, IMF Working Paper No. wp/03/129.Google Scholar
Balls, E. and O'Donnell, G. (2002), Reforming Britain's Economic and Financial Policy, New York, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, A. and Weale, M. (1998), ‘Costs of separating budgetary policy from control of inflation’, Oxford Economic Papers, 50, 3, pp. 449–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, A. (2004), ‘Black Wednesday – a re-examination of Britain's experience in the Exchange Rate Mechanism’, 34th Wincott lecture, October, Institute of Economic Affairs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (2001), ‘Optimal monetary policy in open versus closed economies: an integrated approach’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 91(2), pp. 248–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, C. and Weale, M. (1994), ‘Do we really want an independent central bank?’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 10, 3, pp. 6177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiffinger, S. and De Haan, J. (1996), ‘The political economy of central bank independence’, Princeton Studies in International Economics, No 19.Google Scholar
Hall, S.G. and Henry, S.G.B. (2000), ‘Tax is the key to a lower pound’, Financial Times, 18 May.Google Scholar
Hall, S.G., Henry, S.G.B. and Nixon, J. (1999), ‘Central bank independence and co-ordinating monetary and fiscal policy’, LBS/OEF Economic Outlook, 23, 2, February.Google Scholar
Meade, J.E. (1990), ‘The EMU and the control of inflation’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6, 4, pp. 100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monacelli, T. (2003), ‘Monetary policy in a low pass-through environment’, Working Paper No 227, European Central Bank.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (1994), ‘Policy games: coordination and independence in monetary and fiscal policy’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 139216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, K. (1985), ‘The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, L.E.O. (2000), ‘Open-economy inflation targeting’, Journal of International Economics, 50, pp. 155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. (1995), ‘Optimal contracts for central bankers’, American Economic Review, 85, pp. 150–67.Google Scholar
Wyplosz, C. (2005), ‘Fiscal policy: institutions versus rules’, National Institute Economic Review, 191, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar