Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:40:55.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Tale of Two Cycles: Closure, Downsizing and Productivity Growth in Uk Manufacturing, I973-89

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Nicholas Oulton*
Affiliation:
Bank of England, Monetary Analysis, Division 3, Threadneedle Street, London EC2R 8AH
*
Tel: 020 7601 3717: e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article uses the ARD, the new longitudinal database of the Census of Production, to analyse productivity at the establishment level in the two cycles of 1973–9 and 1979–89. Contrary to a commonly held view, closures did not play a major role in accounting for productivity growth in 1979–89. Establishments which shut had lower productivity than survivors but the exits were replaced by entrants whose productivity was also lower. Hence most of productivity growth was due to growth within survivors. Most productivity growth occurred in establishments which reduced employment. But despite an overall fall of a quarter in employment, 16 per cent of productivity growth occurred in establishments which expanded employment. The main difference between 1973–9 and 1979–89 was in the productivity growth rate amongst survivors. In 1973–9, it was negative overall and over half of employment in 1973 was in establishments where productivity subsequently fell.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baily, M.N., Bartelsman, E.J. and Haltiwanger, J. (1996), ‘Downsizing and productivity growth: myth or reality ?’, in Mayes, D.G. (ed.), Sources of Productivity Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bean, C. and Crafts, N.F.R. (1995), ‘British economic growth since 1945: relative economic decline … and renaissance?’, in Crafts, N. and Toniolo, G. (eds), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, D. and Freeman, R.B. (1994), ‘Did the Thatcher reforms change British labour market performance?’, in Barrell, R. (ed.), The UK Labour Market, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denny, K. and Nickell, S.J. (1992), ‘Unions and investment in British industry’, Economic Journal, 102, pp. 874–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disney, R., Haskel, J. and Heden, Y. (2000), ‘Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing’, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J. and Krizan, C.J. (1998), ‘Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence’, NBER Working Paper No. 6803 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, P., Machin, S. and Metcalf, D. (1993), ‘Signals and cycles: productivity growth and changes in union status in UK companies, 1984-89’, Economic Journal, 103, pp. 894907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R. (1999a), ‘Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, 109, pp. 416–42. (1999b), ‘Productivity and foreign ownership in the UK car industry’, IFS Working Paper no. 99/II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.I.D. (1999), ‘Productive efficiency in UK manufacturing 1974-1994: estimate for five leading sectors’, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Hart, P.E. (1975), ‘Moment distributions in economics: an exposition’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 138, Part 3, pp. 423–34.Google Scholar
Haskel, J. (1991), ‘Imperfect competition, work practices and productivity Growth’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 3 (August), pp. 265–80.Google Scholar
Industry Economics and Statistics Directorate (1997), ‘Differences in companies' performance: British industry's under-performing tail’, London, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Lansbury, M. and Mayes, D.G. (1996), ‘Entry, exit, ownership and the growth of productivity’, in Mayes, D.G. (ed.), Sources of Productivity Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muellbauer, J. (1986), ‘The assessment: productivity and competitiveness in British manufacturing’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2, pp. ixxv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, G.S. and Pakes, A. (1996), ‘The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry’, Econometrica, 64, 6, pp. 1263–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. (1987), ‘Plant closures and the productivity ‘miracle’ in manufacturing’, National Institute Economic Review, 121 (August), pp. 53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Productivity growth in manufacturing, I963-85: the roles of new investment and scrapping’, Nationol Institute Economic Review, 127 (February), pp. 6475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Labour productivity in UK manufacturing in the I970s and in the 1980s’, National Institute Economic Review, 132 (May), pp. 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘Supply side reform and UK economic growth: what happened to the miracle?’, National Institute Economic Review, 154 (November), pp. 5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘The ABI Respondents Database: a new resource for industrial economics research’, Economic Trends, 528 (November), pp. 4657.Google Scholar
(1998a), ‘A tale of two cycles: closure, downsizing and productivity growth in UK manufacturing, 1973-89’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper No. I40 (August).Google Scholar
(1998b), ‘Investment, capital and foreign ownership in UK manufacturing’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper No. I4I (August).Google Scholar
Redding, S. and Proudman, J. (1998), ‘Productivity convergence and international openness’, Bank of England Working Paper No. 77 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar