Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:13:27.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic Effects of Business to Business Internet Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Martin Brookes  and
Zaki Wahhaj
Martin Brookes
Affiliation:
Goldman Sachs International Peterborough Court, 133 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2BB
Zaki Wahhaj
Affiliation:
Goldman Sachs International Peterborough Court, 133 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2BB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that an effective way to analyse the macroeconomic effects of business-to-business electronic commerce is to regard it as a decline in the cost of information to producers. Calculations based on input-output tables and the IMF's Multimod macroeconomic model show that current estimates of such savings translate into about a 5 per cent long-run increase in output in the major industrialised economies. In the medium term, although the deflationary effects of the shock would provide greater room to central banks to keep interest rates low, the simulation results also hint at short-term inflation risks if current demand outstrips supply in anticipation of higher future incomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 175 , January 2001 , pp. 95 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

The authors are grateful to several colleagues for help in preparing this article, most particularly Gavyn Davies, Guy Lamming, Peter Sullivan, Mike Young, Ben Broadbent, Thomas Mayer, David Walton, Tom Berquist and Jamie Friedman.

References

Berquist, T. et al. (1999a), ‘B2B: 2B or Not 2B? Version 1.1’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, November.Google Scholar
Berquist, T. et al. (1999b), ‘The future must leverage the past’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, November.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1995), ‘Information technology as a factor of production: the role of differences among firms’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 95, 3-4, pp. 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, M. and Wahhaj, Z. (2000), ‘The shocking economic effect of B2B’, Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper No. 37.Google Scholar
The Economist (1999), ‘E-business comes of age’, 6 November.Google Scholar
Lapidus, G. (2000), ‘Gentlemen, start your search engines’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, January.Google Scholar
Layard, R., Nickell, S. and Jackman, R. (1991), Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and Labour Market, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, G. (2000), Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. and Blair, P. (1985), Input-Output Analysis - Foundations and Extensions, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1990), ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5, pp. 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington Post (1999), ‘In a tech-led economy, speed begets productivity’, 21 November.Google Scholar