Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:13:48.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tight closure in F-rational rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Ian M. Aberbach
Ian M. Aberbach*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, U. S. A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

All rings are commutative with unit and modules are unital. With one exception all rings are Noetherian. We consider only rings of positive characteristic p. Section 0 contains background, definitions and terminology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 135 , September 1994 , pp. 43 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1994

References

[A] Aberbach, I. M., Finite phantom projective dimension, Amer. J. Math., 116 (1994), 447–477.Google Scholar
[AHH] Aberbach, I. M., Hochster, M. and Huneke, C., Localization of tight closure and modules of finite phantom projective dimension, J. reine angew. Math., 434 (1993), 67–114.Google Scholar
[BE] Buchsbaum, D. A. and Eisenbud, D., What Makes a Complex Exact?, J. Algebra, 25 (1973), 259–268.Google Scholar
[CE] Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., Homological Algebra, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956.Google Scholar
[FW] Fedder, R. and Watanabe, K., A characterization of F-regularity in terms of F-purity, Commutative Algebra (Proceedings of a Microprogram held June 15-July 2, 1987), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 15, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin-Heidelberg-London-Paris-Tokyo, 1989, pp. 227–245.Google Scholar
[H] Hochster, M., Topics in the homological theory of modules over commutative rings, C.B.M.S. Regional Conf. Ser. in Math. no. 24, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, R. I., 1975.Google Scholar
[HH1] Hochster, M. and Huneke, C., Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Briançon-Skoda theorem, J. Amer. Soc, 3 (1990), 31–116.Google Scholar
[HH2] Hochster, M. and Huneke, C., Infinite integral extensions and big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, Annals of Math., 135 (1992), 53–89.Google Scholar
[HH3] Hochster, M. and Huneke, C., F-regularity, test elements, and smooth base change, preprint.Google Scholar
[HH4] Hochster, M. and Huneke, C., Phantom homology, Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, R. I., 1993.Google Scholar
[PS] Peskine, C. and Szpiro, L., Dimension projective finie et cohomologie locale, I.H.E.S. Publ. Math., 42 (1973), 323–395.Google Scholar
[S] Smith, K. E., Tight closure of parameter ideals, Invent. Math., 115 (1994), 41–60.Google Scholar