Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T10:00:24.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A remark on algebraic surfaces with polyhedral Mori cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Viacheslav V. Nikulin
Viacheslav V. Nikulin*
Affiliation:
Steklov Mathematical Institute, ul. Gubkina 8, Moscow 117966, GSP-1, RussiaDept. of Pure Math. of the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We denote by FPMC the class of all non-singular projective algebraic surfaces X over ℂ with finite polyhedral Mori cone NE(X) ⊂ NS(X) ⊗ ℝ. If ρ(X) = rk NS(X) ≥ 3, then the set Exc(X) of all exceptional curves on X ∈ FPMC is finite and generates NE(X). Let δE(X) be the maximum of (-C2) and pE(X) the maximum of pa(C) respectively for all C ∈ Exc(X). For fixed ρ ≥ 3, δE and pE we denote by FPMCρ,δE,pE the class of all algebraic surfaces X ∈ FPMC such that ρ(X) = ρ, δE(X) = δE and pE(X) = pE. We prove that the class FPMCρ,δE,pE is bounded in the following sense: for any X ∈ FPMCρ,δE,pE there exist an ample effective divisor h and a very ample divisor h′ such that h2 ≤ N(ρ, δE) and h′2 ≤ N′(ρ, δE, pE) where the constants N(ρ, δE) and N′(ρ, δE, pE) depend only on ρ, δE and ρ, δE, pE respectively.

One can consider Theory of surfaces X ∈ FPMC as Algebraic Geometry analog of the Theory of arithmetic reflection groups in hyperbolic spaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 157 , 2000 , pp. 73 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2000

References

[AN1] Alexeev, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., The classification of Del Pezzo surfaces with log terminal singularities of the index ≤ 2, involutions of K3 surfaces and reflection groups in Lobachevsky spaces (Russian), Doklady po matematike i prilogeniyam, MIAN, 2 (1988), no. 2, 51–150.Google Scholar
[AN2] V.Alexeev, A. and Nikulin, V.V., The classification of Del Pezzo surfaces with log terminal singularities of the index ≤ 2 and involutions of K3 surfaces, Dokl. AN SSSR, 306 (1989), no. 3, 525–528.Google Scholar
[B1] Borcherds, R., Automorphic forms on Os+2,2 and infinite products, Invent. Math., 120 (1995), 161–213.Google Scholar
[B2] Borcherds, R., The moduli space of Enriques surfaces and the fake monster Lie super- algebra, Topology, 35 (1996), no. 3, 699–710.Google Scholar
[CCL] Cardoso, G.L., Curio, G. and Löst, D., Perturbative coupling and modular forms in N = 2 string models with a Wilson line, Nucl. Phys., B491 (1997), 147–183; hep-th/9608154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CD] F.Cossec, R. and Dolgachev, I.V., Enriques surfaces I, Birkhäuser, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 76, 1989, pp. 397.Google Scholar
[D] Dolgachev, I.V., On rational surfaces with elliptic pencil (Russian), Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. matem., 30 (1966), 1073–1100.Google Scholar
[E] Esselmann, F., Über die maximale Dimension von Lorentz-Gittern mit coendlicher Spiegelungsgruppe, J. Number Theory, 61 (1996), 103–144.Google Scholar
[GN] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., Siegel automorphic form correction of some Lorentzian Kac-Moody Lie algebras, Amer. J. Math., 119 (1997), no. 1, 181–224; alg-geom/9504006.Google Scholar
[GN2] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., Siegel automorphic form correction of a Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebra, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B, 321 (1995), 1151–1156.Google Scholar
[GN3] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., K3 surfaces, Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebras and mirror symmetry, Math. Res. Lett., 3 (1996), no. 2, 211–229; alg-geom/9510008.Google Scholar
[GN4] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., The Igusa modular forms and “the simplest” Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebras, Matem. Sbornik, 187 (1996), no. 11, 27–66.Google Scholar
[GN5] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., Automorphic forms and Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebras. Part I, Intern. J. Math., 9 (1998), no. 2, 153–199; alg-geom/9610022.Google Scholar
[GN6] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., Automorphic forms and Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebras. Part II, Intern. J. Math., 9 (1998), no. 2, 201–275; alg-geom/9611028.Google Scholar
[GN7] Gritsenko, V.A. and Nikulin, V.V., The arithmetic mirror symmetry and Calabi-Yau manifolds, Commun. Math., to appear; alg-geom/9612002.Google Scholar
[Hal] Halphen, , Sur les courbes planes du sixiéme degré à neuf points doubles, Bull. Soc. math. France, 10 (1881), 162–172.Google Scholar
[Har] Hartshorne, R., Algebraic Geometry, Springer, 1977, pp. 496.Google Scholar
[HM] Harvey, J. and Moore, G., Algebras, BPS-states, and strings, Nucl. Physics., B463 (1996), 315–368; hep-th/9510182.Google Scholar
[Ka] Kawai, T., String duality and modular forms, Phys. Lett., B397 (1997), 51–62; hep-th/9607078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Kaw] Kawamata, Y., A generalization of Kodaira-Ramanujam’s vanishing theorem, Math. Ann., 261 (1982), 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ko] Kondo, S., Enriques surfaces with finite automorphism groups, Japanese J. Math., 12 (1986), no. 2, 191–282.Google Scholar
[L] Lazarsfeld, R., Lectures on linear systems, Complex Algebraic Geometry (Kollar, J., eds.), Amer. Math. Soc. (IAS/Park City, Math. Series, Vol. 3) (1997).Google Scholar
[Ma] Manin, Yu.I., Cubic forms: Algebra, Geometry, Arithmetic, Nauka, 1972.Google Scholar
[Mo] Mori, S., Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective, Ann. Math., 116 (1982), no. 1, 133–176.Google Scholar
[Moo] Moore, G., String duality, automorphic forms, and generalized Kac-Moody algebras, Preprint (1997; hep-th/9710198).Google Scholar
[Na] Nagata, M., On rational surfaces I, II, Mem. of College of Sci. Univ. of Kyoto, Ser. A, 32 (1960), no, 3 351–370.Google Scholar
[N1] Nikulin, V.V., Integral symmetric bilinear forms and some of their geometric applications, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 43 (1979), 111–177.Google Scholar
[N2] Nikulin, V.V., On factor groups of the automorphism groups of hyperbolic forms modulo subgroups generated by 2-reflections, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 248 (1979), 1307–1309.Google Scholar
[N3] Nikulin, V.V., On the quotient groups of the automorphism groups of hyperbolic forms by the subgroups generated by 2-reflections, Algebraic-geometric applications, Current Problems in Math. Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Informatsii, Moscow, 18 (1981), 3–114.Google Scholar
[N4] Nikulin, V.V., On arithmetic groups generated by reflections in Lobachevsky spaces, Math. USSR Izv., 16 (1981), 637–669.Google Scholar
[N5] Nikulin, V.V., On the classification of arithmetic groups generated by reflections in Lobachevsky spaces, Math. USSR Izv., 18 (1982), 45 (1981), no. 1, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N6] Nikulin, V.V., Surfaces of type K3 with finite automorphism group and Picard group of rank three, Trudy Inst. Steklov, 165 (1984), 113–142.Google Scholar
[N7] Nikulin, V.V., On a description of the automorphism groups of Enriques surfaces, Dokl. AN SSSR, 277 (1984), 1324–1327.Google Scholar
[N8] Nikulin, V.V., Discrete reflection groups in Lobachevsky spaces and algebraic surfaces, Proc. Int. Congr. Math. Berkeley 1986, 1, pp. 654–669.Google Scholar
[N9] Nikulin, V.V., Basis of the diagram method for generalized reflection groups in Lobachevsky spaces and algebraic surfaces with nef anticanonical class, Intern. J. of Math., 7 (1996), no. 1, 71–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N10] Nikulin, V.V., A lecture on Kac-Moody Lie algebras of the arithmetic type, Preprint Queen’s University, Canada, #1994-16, (1994).Google Scholar
[N11] Nikulin, V.V., Reflection groups in Lobachevsky spaces and the denominator identity for Lorentzian Kac-Moody algebras, Izv. Akad. Nauk of Russia. Ser. Mat., 60 (1996), no. 2, 73–106.Google Scholar
[N12] Nikulin, V.V., The remark on discriminants of K3 surfaces moduli as sets of zeros of automorphic forms, J. of Mathematical Sciences,, 81 (1996), no. 3, Plenum Publishing; alg-geom/9512018, 2738–2743.Google Scholar
[N13] Nikulin, V.V., K3 surfaces with interesting groups of automorphisms, J. of Math. Sciences, to appear; alg-geom/9701011.Google Scholar
[N14] Nikulin, V.V., On the classification of hyperbolic root systems of the rank three., Preprint Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik,, MPI-99 (1999).Google Scholar
[O] Ogg, A., Cohomology of abelian varieties over function fields, Ann. Math., 76 (1962), 185–212.Google Scholar
[P-ŠŠ] Pjatetckiĭ-Šapiro, I.I. and Šafarevich, I.R., A Torelli theorem for algebraic surfaces of type K3, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 35 (1971), 530–572.Google Scholar
[R] Reider, I., Vector bundles of rank 2 and linear systems on algebraic surfaces, Ann. Math., 127 (1988), 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh1] Šafarevič, I.R. (ed.), Algebraic surfaces, Proc. Steklov Math. Instit., 1965.Google Scholar
[Sh2] Šafarevič, I.R. (ed.) Basic Algebraic Geometry, Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
[Sh3] Šafarevič, I.R. (ed.) Principal homogeneous spaces over function fields, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 64 (1961), 316–346.Google Scholar
[Vie] Viehweg, E., Vanishing theorems, J. reine und angew. Math., 335 (1982), 1–8.Google Scholar
[V1] Vinberg, E.B., The absence of crystallographic reflection groups in Lobachevsky spaces of large dimension, Trudy Moscow. Mat. Obshch., 47 (1984), 67–102.Google Scholar
[V2] Vinberg, E.B., Hyperbolic reflection groups, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 40 (1985), 29–66.Google Scholar