Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:21:08.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Projective summands in generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

David Eisenbud
Affiliation:
Brandéis University, Waltham, MA 02154
Wolmer Vasconcelos
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903
Roger Wiegand
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An R-module M is a generator (of the category of modules) provided every module is a homomorphic image of a suitable direct sum of copies of M. Equivalently, some M(k) has R as a summand. Except in the last section, all rings are assumed to be commutative, Noetherian domains, and modules are usually finitely generated. In this context generators are exactly those modules that have non-zero free summands locally. Of course, generators can fail to have free summands (e.g., over Dedekind domains), and we ask whether they necessarily have non-zero projective summands. The answer is “yes” for rings of dimension 1, as we point out in § 3, and for the polynomial ring in one variable over a Dedekind domain. In § 1 we show that for 2-dimensional rings the answer is intimately connected with the structure of projective modules. Our main result in the positive direction, Theorem 1.3, grew out of the attempt, in conversations with T. Stafford, to understand the case R = k[x, y]. In § 2 we give examples of rings having generators with no projective summands. The last section contains miscellaneous observations, some of them on rings without chain conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1982

References

[E] Evans, E. G. Jr., Krull-Schmidt and cancellation over local rings, Pacific J. Math., 46 (1973), 115121.Google Scholar
[GW] Geramita, A. and Weibel, C., Ideals with trivial conormal bundle, Canadian J. Math., 32 (1980), 210218.Google Scholar
[Ma] Matsumura, H., Commutative Algebra, Benjamin, New York 1970.Google Scholar
[Mi] Miyata, T., Note on direct summands of modules, J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 7 (1967), 6569.Google Scholar
[MS] Murthy, M. P. and Swan, R. G., Vector bundles over affine surfaces, Invent. Math., 36 (1976), 125165.Google Scholar
[S] Serre, J. P., Sur les modules projectifs, Sem. Dubreil-Pisot, 14, No. 2 (19601961).Google Scholar
[VW] Vasconcelos, W. and Wiegand, R., Bounding the number of generators of a module, Math. Z., 164 (1978), 17.Google Scholar