Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:20:59.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On classification of quasi-symmetric domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

I. Satake
I. Satake*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The notion of “Siegel domains” was introduced by [8]. It was then shown that every homogeneous bounded domain is holomorphically equivalent to a Siegel domain (of the second kind) determined uniquely up to an affine isomorphism ([15], cf. also [2], [4], [9b]). In a recent note [10b], I have shown that among (homogeneous) Siegel domains the symmetric domains can be characterized by three conditions (i), (ii), (iii) on the data (U, V, Ω, F) defining the Siegel domain (see Theorem in § 2 of this paper). The class of homogeneous Siegel domains satisfying partial conditions (i), (ii), which we propose to call “quasi-symmetric”, seems to be of some interest, since for instance the fibers appearing in the expressions of symmetric domains as Siegel domains of the third kind fall in this class ([10b], [16]).

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 62 , September 1976 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1976

References

[1] Braun, H. and Koecher, M., Jordan-Algebren, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Kaneyuki, S., On the automorphism groups of homogeneous bounded domains, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 14 (1967), 89–130.Google Scholar
[3] Kaup, W., Einige Bemerkungen über polynomiale Vektorfelder, Jordanalgebren und die Automorphismen von Siegelschen Gebieten, Math. Ann. 204 (1973), 131–144.Google Scholar
[4] Kaup, W., Matsushima, Y. and Ochiai, T., On the automorphisms and equivalences of generalized Siegel domains, Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 475–498.Google Scholar
[5] Koecher, M., (a) Jordan algebras and their applications, Lecture Notes, Univ. of Minnesota, 1962.Google Scholar
(b) Imbedding of Jordan algebras into Lie algebras, I., Amer. J. Math. 89 (1967), 787–816; II, ibid. 90 (1968), 476–510.Google Scholar
(c) An elementary approach to bounded symmetric domains, Lecture Notes, Rice Univ., Houston, 1969.Google Scholar
[6] Murakami, S., On automorphisms of Siegel domains, Lecture Notes in Math., No. 286, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1972.Google Scholar
[7] Nakajima, K., Some studies on Siegel domains, J. Math. Soc. Japan 27 (1975), 54–75.Google Scholar
[8] , , I. I., Geometry of classical domains and theory of automorphic functions (in Russian), Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1961; English transl., Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969; French transl., Dunod, Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
[9] Rothaus, O. S., (a) The construction of homogeneous convex cones, Ann. of Math. 83 (1966), 358–376.Google Scholar
(b) Automorphisms of Siegel domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 162 (1971), 351–382.Google Scholar
[10] Satake, I., (a) Linear imbeddings of self-dual homogeneous cones, Nagoya Math. J. 46 (1972), 121–145; Corrections, ibid. 60 (1976), 219.Google Scholar
(b) Infinitesimal automorphisms of symmetric Siegel domains (Unpublished note, 1974)9).Google Scholar
[11] Takeuchi, M., (a) On infinitesimal affine automorphisms of Siegel domains, Proc. Japan Acad. 45 (1969), 590–594.Google Scholar
(b) Homogeneous Siegel domains, Publ. Study Group Geometry, No. 7, Tokyo, 1973.Google Scholar
(c) On symmetric Siegel domains, Nagoya Math. J. 59 (1975), 9–44.Google Scholar
[12] Tanaka, N., On infinitesimal automorphisms of Siegel domains, J. Math. Soc. Japan 22 (1970), 180–212.Google Scholar
[13] Tsuji, T., Siegel domains over self-dual cones and their automorphisms, Nagoya Math. J. 55 (1974), 33–80.Google Scholar
[14] Vinberg, È. B., (a) Homogeneous cones, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 133 (1960), 9–12; = Soviet Math. Dokl. 1 (1960), 787–790.Google Scholar
(b) The theory of convex homogeneous cones, Trudy Moskow Mat. Obšč. 12 (1963), 303–358; = Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. (1963), 340–403.Google Scholar
[15] Vinberg, È. B., Gindikin, S. G. and , , I. I., Classification and canonical realization of complex bounded homogeneous domains, Trudy Moskow Mat. Obšč. 12 (1963), 359–388; = Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. (1963), 404–437.Google Scholar
[16] Wolf, J. and Korányi, A., Generalized Cayley transformations of bounded symmetric domains, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 899–939.Google Scholar