Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:49:32.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Algebras of Dominant Dimension One

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Bruno J. Mueller*
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

QF-3 algebras R are classified according to their second commutator algebras R′ with respect to the minimal faithful module, which satisfy dom.dim. R′ ≧ 2. The class C(S) of all QF-3 algebras whose second commutator is S, contains besides S only algebras R with dom.dim. R = 1. C(S) contains a unique (up to isomorphism) minimal algebra which can be represented as a subalgebra S0 of S describable in terms of the structure of S, and C(S) consists just of the algebras S0RS (up to isomorphism).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1968

References

[1] Harada, M., QF-3 and semi-primary PP-rings I, II. Osaka Math. J. 2, 357368 (1965); 3, 2128 (1966).Google Scholar
[2] Mochizuki, H.Y., On the double commutator algebra of QF-3 algebras. Nagoya Math. J. 25, 221230 (1965).Google Scholar
[3] Morita, K., Duality for modules and its application to the theory of rings with minimum condition. Science Reports Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku 6, 83142 (1958).Google Scholar
[4] Mueller, B.J., The classification of algebras by dominant dimension. Can. J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[5] Tachikawa, H., On dominant dimensions of QF-3 algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112, 249266 (1964).Google Scholar
[6] Thrall, R.M., Some generalizations of quasi-Frobenius algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64, 173183 (1948).Google Scholar