Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:15:31.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Harder–Narasimhan reduction of a principal bundle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Indranil Biswas  and
Yogish I. Holla
Indranil Biswas
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India, [email protected]
Yogish I. Holla
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let E be a principal G–bundle over a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field k, where G is a reductive linear algebraic group over k. We construct a canonical reduction of E. The uniqueness of canonical reduction is proved under the assumption that the characteristic of k is zero. Under a mild assumption on the characteristic, the uniqueness is also proved when the characteristic of k is positive.

Keywords

14H6032L05
Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 174 , 2004 , pp. 201 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2004

References

[1] Atiyah, M. F. and Bott, R., The Yang–Mills equations over Riemann surfaces, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 308 (1982), 523–615.Google Scholar
[2] Anchouche, B., Azad, H. and Biswas, I., Harder–Narasimhan reduction for principal bundles over a compact Kähler manifold, Math. Ann., 323 (2002), 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Behrend, K. A., Semistability of reductive group schemes over curves, Math. Ann., 301 (1995), 281–305.Google Scholar
[4] Harder, G. and Narasimhan, M. S., On the cohomology groups of moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves, Math. Ann., 212 (1975), 215–248.Google Scholar
[5] Ilangovan, S., Mehta, V. B. and Parameswaran, A. J., Semistability and semisimplicity in representations of low height in positive characteristic, A tribute to C. S. Seshadri, a collection of articles on Geometry and Representation Theory, to appear.Google Scholar
[6] Kumar, S. and Narasimhan, M. S., Picard group of the moduli spaces of G–bundles, Math. Ann., 308 (1997), 155–173.Google Scholar
[7] Mehta, V. B. and Subramanian, S., On the Harder-Narasimhan filtration of principal bundles, Algebra, Arithmetic and Geometry (Ed. R. Parimala), pp. 405–415. Narosa Pub. House, 2002.Google Scholar
[8] Ramanan, S. and Ramanathan, A., Some remarks on the instability flag, Tohoku Math. J., 36 (1984), 269–291.Google Scholar
[9] Ramanathan, A., Moduli of principal bundle, Algebraic geometry (Proc. Summer Meeting, Univ. Copenhagen, 1978), pp. 527–533, Lecture Notes in Math. 732, Springer, Berlin, 1979.Google Scholar
[10] Serre, J.-P., Sur la semisimplicité des produits tensorial de représentations, Invent. Math., 116 (1994), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Serre, J.-P., Moursund Lectures, (notes by W. E. Duckworth). University of Oregon Mathematics Department, 1998.Google Scholar