Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:53:12.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dilogarithm identities for conformal field theories and cluster algebras: Simply laced case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2016

Tomoki Nakanishi*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8604, Japan, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The dilogarithm identities for the central charges of conformal field theories of simply laced type were conjectured by Bazhanov, Kirillov, and Reshetikhin. Their functional generalizations were conjectured by Gliozzi and Tateo. They have been partly proved by various authors. We prove these identities in full generality for any pair of Dynkin diagrams of simply laced type based on the cluster algebra formulation of the Y-systems.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2011

References

[BR1] Bazhanov, V. V. and Reshetikhin, N. Y., Critical RSOS models and conformal field theory, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 4 (1989), 115142.Google Scholar
[BR2] Bazhanov, V. V. and Reshetikhin, N. Y., Restricted solid-on-solid models connected with simply laced algebras and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A 23 (1990), 14771492.Google Scholar
[B] Bloch, S., “Applications of the dilogarithm function in algebraic K-theory and algebraic geometry” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algebraic Geometry (Kyoto, 1977), Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1978, 103114.Google Scholar
[CGT] Caracciolo, R., Gliozzi, F., and Tateo, R., A topological invariant of RG flows in 2D integrable quantum field theories, Internat. J. Modern Phys. 13 (1999), 29272932.Google Scholar
[C] Chapoton, F., Functional identities for the Rogers dilogarithm associated to cluster Y-systems, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 37 (2005), 755760.Google Scholar
[DWZ] Derksen, H., Weyman, J., and Zelevinsky, A., Quivers with potentials and their representations II: Applications to cluster algebras, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 749790.Google Scholar
[DS] Dupont, J. L. and Sah, C.-H., Dilogarithm identities in conformal field theory and group homology, Comm. Math. Phys. 161 (1994), 265282.Google Scholar
[FZ] Fateev, V. A. and Zamolodchikov, A. B., Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points in ZN-symmetric statistical systems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 62 (1985), 215225.Google Scholar
[FG] Fock, V. V. and Goncharov, A. B., Cluster ensembles, quantization and the dilogarithm, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 39 (2009), 865930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FZ1] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Cluster algebras, I: Foundations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), 497529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FZ2] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Cluster algebras, II: Finite type classification, Invent. Math. 154 (2003), 63121.Google Scholar
[FZ3] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Y-systems and generalized associahedra, Ann. of Math. (2) 158 (2003), 9771018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FZ4] Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A., Cluster algebras, IV: Coefficients, Compos. Math. 143 (2007), 112164.Google Scholar
[FS] Frenkel, E. and Szenes, A., Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz and dilogarithm identities, I, Math. Res. Lett. 2 (1995), 677693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[G] Gepner, D., New conformal field theories associated with Lie algebras and their partition functions, Nuclear Phys. B 290 (1987), 1024.Google Scholar
[GW] Gepner, D. and Witten, E., String theory on group manifolds, Nuclear Phys. B 278 (1986), 493549.Google Scholar
[GT1] Gliozzi, F. and Tateo, R., ADE functional dilogarithm identities and integrable models, Phys. Lett. B 348 (1995), 677693.Google Scholar
[GT2] Gliozzi, F. and Tateo, R., Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz and three-fold triangulations, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 11 (1996), 40514064.Google Scholar
[HW] Hutchins, H. C. and Weinert, H. J., Homomorphisms and kernels of semifields, Period. Math. Hungar. 21 (1990), 113152.Google Scholar
[IIKKN1] Inoue, R., Iyama, O., Keller, B., Kuniba, A., and Nakanishi, T., Periodicities of T and Y-systems, dilogarithm identities, and cluster algebras, I: Type Br , preprint, arXiv:1001.1880 [math.QA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[IIKKN2] Inoue, R., Iyama, O., Keller, B., Kuniba, A., and Nakanishi, T., Periodicities of T and Y-systems, dilogarithm identities, and cluster algebras, II: Types Cr, F4, and G2 , preprint, arXiv:1001.1881 [math.QA]Google Scholar
[IIKNS] Inoue, R., Iyama, O., Kuniba, A., Nakanishi, T., and Suzuki, J., Periodicities of T-systems and Y-systems, Nagoya Math. J. 197 (2010), 59174.Google Scholar
[Ke1] Keller, B., Cluster algebras, quiver representations and triangulated categories, preprint, arXiv:0807.1960 [math.RT]Google Scholar
[Ke2] Keller, B., The periodicity conjecture for pairs of Dynkin diagrams, preprint, arXiv:1001.1531 [math.RT]Google Scholar
[K1] Kirillov, A. N., Identities for the Rogers dilogarithm function connected with simple Lie algebras, J. Soviet Math. 47 (1989), 24502458.Google Scholar
[K2] Kirillov, A. N., Dilogarithm identities, Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. 118 (1995), 61142.Google Scholar
[KR1] Kirillov, A. N. and Reshetikhin, N. Y., Exact solution of the Heisenberg XXZ model of spin s, J. Soviet Math. 35 (1986), 26272643.Google Scholar
[KR2] Kirillov, A. N. and Reshetikhin, N. Y., Representations of Yangians and multiplicities of the inclusion of the irreducible components of the tensor product of representations of simple Lie algebras, J. Soviet Math. 52 (1990), 31563164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KnZ] Knizhnik, V. G. and Zamolodchikov, A. B., Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions, Nuclear Phys. B 247 (1984), 83103.Google Scholar
[Ku] Kuniba, A., Thermodynamics of the Uq () Bethe ansatz system with q a root of unity, Nuclear Phys. B 389 (1993), 209244.Google Scholar
[KuN] Kuniba, A. and Nakanishi, T., Spectra in conformal field theories from the Rogers dilogarithm, Modern Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992), 34873494.Google Scholar
[KuNS] Kuniba, A., Nakanishi, T., and Suzuki, J., T-systems and Y-systems for quantum affinizations of quantum Kac-Moody algebras, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 5 (2009), 123.Google Scholar
[L] Lewin, L., Polylogarithms and Associated Functions, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981.Google Scholar
[N] Nahm, W., “Conformal field theory and torsion elements of the Bloch group” in Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry, II, Springer, Berlin, 2007, 67132 Google Scholar
[NK] Nahm, W. and Keegan, S., Integrable deformations of CFTs and the discrete Hirota equations, preprint, arXiv.0905.3776 [hep-th]Google Scholar
[NRT] Nahm, W., Recknagel, A., and Terhoeven, M., Dilogarithm identities in conformal field theory, Modern Phys. Lett. A 8 (1993), 18351847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[RTV] Ravanini, F., Tateo, R., and Valleriani, A., Dynkin TBA’s, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 8 (1993), 17071727.Google Scholar
[RS] Richmond, B. and Szekeres, G., Some formulas related to dilogarithm, the zeta function and the Andrews-Gordon identities, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 31 (1981), 362373.Google Scholar
[S] Szenes, A., Periodicity of Y-systems and flat connections, Lett. Math. Phys. 89 (2009), 217230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[V] Volkov, A. Y., On the periodicity conjecture for Y-systems, Comm. Math. Phys. 276 (2007), 509517.Google Scholar
[Zag1] Zagier, D., “Polylogarithms, Dedekind zeta functions, and the algebraic K-theory of fields” in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry, Progr. Math. 89, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990, 391430.Google Scholar
[Zag2] Zagier, D., “The dilogarithm function” in Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry, II, Springer, Berlin, 2007, 365.Google Scholar
[Zam] Zamolodchikov, A. B., On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991), 391394.Google Scholar