Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:46:44.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birational automorphism groups and differential equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Hiroshi Umemura*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Painlevé studied the differential equations y″ = R(y′ y, x) without moving critical point, where R is a rational function of y′ y, x. Most of them are integrated by the so far known functions. There are 6 equations called Painlevé’s equations which seem to be irreducible or seem to define new transcendental functions. The simplest one among them is y″ = 6y2 + x. Painlevé declared on Comptes Rendus in 1902-03 that y″ = 6y2 + x is irreducible. It seems that R. Liouville pointed out an error in his argument. In fact there are discussions on this subject between Painlevé and Liouville on Comptes Rendus in 1902-03. In 1915 J. Drach published a new proof of the irreducibility of the differential equation y″ = 6y2 + x. The both proofs depend on the differential Galois theory developed by Drach. But the differential Galois theory of Drach contains errors and gaps and it is not easy to understand their proofs. One of our contemporaries writes in his book: the differential equation y″ = 6y2 + x seems to be irreducible dans un sens que on ne peut pas songer à préciser. This opinion illustrates well the general attitude of the nowadays mathematicians toward the irreducibility of the differential equation y″ = 6y2 + x. Therefore the irreducibility of the differential equation y″ = 6y2 + x remains to be proved. We consider that to give a rigorous proof of the irreducibility of the differential equation y″ = 6y2 + x is one of the most important problem in the theory of differential equations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1990

References

[B] Borel, A., Linear algebraic groups, Benjamin, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
[D] Demazure, M., Sous-groupes algébriques de rang maximum du groupe de Cremona, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup., 4e série, t. 3 (1970), 507-588.Google Scholar
[Di] Dieudonné, J., Calcul infinitesimal, Collection Methodes, Hermann, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
[E.G.A.] Grothendieck, A., Elements de géométrie algébriuqe, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S., nos 4, 7, 11,…, P.U.F., 1960, 1961,….Google Scholar
[G1] Grothendieck, A., Technique de construction en géométrie analytique VII, Rapport sur les théorèmes de finitude de Grauert et Remmert Sém. H. Cartan 13e année 1960/61, n° 15.Google Scholar
[G2] Grothendieck, A., Technique de descente et théorème d’existence en géométrie algébrique IV, les schemas de Hilbert, Sém. Bourbaki, 1.13, 1960/61, n° 221.Google Scholar
[K] Kraus, G., Meromorphe Funktionen auf allgemeinen komplexen Raumen, Math. Ann., 209 (1974), 257-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[M] Mumford, D., Algebraic geometry I, Complex projective varieties, Grund. der math. Wiss. 221, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1976.Google Scholar
[P] Painlevé, P., Leçons de Stockholm, Œuvres de P. Painlevé I, 199818, Editions du C.N.R.S., Paris, 1972.Google Scholar
[U1] Umemura, H., Sur les sous-groupes algébriques primitifs de groupe de Cremona à trois variables, Nagoya Math. J., 79 (1980), 4767.Google Scholar
[U2] Umemura, H., Algebro-geometric problems arising from Painleve’s works, Algebraic and Topological Theories—to the memory of Dr. Takehiko MIYATA, 467495, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1985.Google Scholar
[W] Weil, A., On algebraic groups of transformations, Amer. J. Math., 77 (1955), 355391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Z] Zariski, O., Introduction to the problem of minimal models in the theory of algebraic surfaces, Publ. of Math. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, 1958.Google Scholar