Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:26:36.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A rapid molecular method for differentiating two special forms (lycopersici and radicis-lycopersici) of Fusarium oxysporum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2004

Idress H. ATTITALLA
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jamshid FATEHI
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jens LEVENFORS
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sture BRISHAMMAR
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two pathogenic special forms (f. sp.) of the Fusarium oxysporum species complex f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) and f. sp. radicis-lycopersici (Forl) are morphologically indistinguishable. Although they are pathogenic to the same host genus Lycopersicon (tomato), and infect the same tomato cultivar, they form distinct diseases; Fol causes wilt and Forl causes crown rot and root rot. These two special forms apparently exist as genetically isolated populations, based on vegetative compatibility and molecular variation at the DNA level. In seeking efficient diagnostic tools for differentiating Fol and Forl isolates, we examined three techniques: isozyme analysis, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) RFLP by HaeIII-digestion of total genomic DNA, and an osmotic method using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to detect fungal pigments. The isolates were collected from geographically widespread locations. Distinct HPLC-profile differences were found between an endophytic non-pathogenic isolate and the other pathogenic isolates. However, the direct mtDNA RFLP technique proved to be an efficient diagnostic tool for routine differentiation of Fol and Forl isolates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)