Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:45:45.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of molecular characters for the phylogeny of the genus Entyloma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2003

Dominik BEGEROW
Affiliation:
Universität Tübingen, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Matthias LUTZ
Affiliation:
Universität Tübingen, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Franz OBERWINKLER
Affiliation:
Universität Tübingen, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many species formerly listed in Entyloma have been removed and are now placed in several orders. This study aims to clarify the framework of the genus Entyloma and the phylogeny of these plant parasitic smut fungi with molecular data. Analyses of LSU and ITS sequences are presented and support the monophyly of the order Entylomatales. The sequences show higher similarities within the examined species of Entyloma than within other smut families and genera, suggesting a recent radiation. Within the Entylomatales a cluster of anamorphic Tilletiopsis washingtonensis, T. lilacina and T. cremea collections is the sister group to Entyloma. The phylogenetic relationships in the genus Entyloma are a result of joint evolution with their hosts. The analyses of the sequence data show unresolved groups on Ranunculales and a well-supported group on Asteridae.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Part 203 in the series ‘Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes’ from Botanical Institute, University of Tübingen.