Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:29:07.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFLP evidence of the distinctive patterns of life-cycle in two forms of Melampsora rust on Salix viminalis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2000

M. H. PEI
Affiliation:
IACR-Long Ashton Research Station, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bristol, Long Ashton, Bristol BS41 9AF, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
C. RUIZ
Affiliation:
IACR-Long Ashton Research Station, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bristol, Long Ashton, Bristol BS41 9AF, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used to examine genetic variation in two forms of Melampsora rust on Salix viminalis, the ‘stem-infecting form’ (SIF) and the f. sp. larici-epitea typica (LET) of M. epitea. A simple two-tube method was used to obtain genomic DNA suitable for AFLP. Eleven SIF and 26 LET isolates from the UK were tested using two primer combinations. Of the 215 AFLP markers scored, 93% were polymorphic. AFLP profiles were distinct between SIF and LET (Nei & Li's similarity coefficients between SIF and LET isolates = 22–35%). Within SIF, AFLP patterns were very similar (similarity > 98–9%), indicating that SIF is an asexual population and may have a clonal lineage. Within LET, similarities were > 69%. LET isolates collected from a site at Long Ashton in 1991–1993 were closely related and, therefore, may have come from the same local source. Similarity data from AFLP were in good agreement (Spearman's rank correlation = 0.85) with that of RAPD when both SIF and LET isolates were included, but the correlation was less obvious (= 0.49) when only LET isolates were included. Identical banding patterns were obtained when AFLP was performed using either a Perkin–Elmer 480 or a Perkin–Elmer 9700 Thermocyclers, each programmed with a different PCR profile.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)