Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kasanen, R.
Kaitera, J.
and
Hantula, J.
2000.
The genetic composition of Peridermium pini and Cronartium flaccidum cankers on Scots pine as revealed by two multi‐allelic loci.
Forest Pathology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
221.
Hantula, Jarkko
Kasanen, Risto
Kaitera, Juha
and
Moricca, Salvatore
2002.
Analyses of genetic variation suggest that pine rusts Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini belong to the same species.
Mycological Research,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 2,
p.
203.
Varmola, Martti
Hyppönen, Mikko
Mäkitalo, Kari
Mikkola, Kari
and
Timonen, Mauri
2004.
Forest Management and Regeneration Success in Protection Forests near the Timberline in Finnish Lapland.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 5,
p.
424.
Samils, Berit
Ihrmark, Katarina
Kaitera, Juha
Stenlid, Jan
and
Barklund, Pia
2011.
New genetic markers for identifying Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini and examining genetic variation within and between lesions of Scots pine blister rust in Sweden.
Fungal Biology,
Vol. 115,
Issue. 12,
p.
1303.
2022.
Samils, Berit
and
Stenlid, Jan
2022.
A review of biology, epidemiology and management of Cronartium pini with emphasis on Northern Europe.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 3,
p.
153.
Zhang, Ke
and
Stenlid, Jan
2023.
Detection and quantification of Cronartium pini from Scots pine bark and wood with Cronartium spp.‐specific quantitative PCR.
Forest Pathology,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 6,
Zhang, Ke
and
Samils, Berit
2024.
Differences in population structure and zygosity between heteroecious and autoecious forms of Cronartium pini suggest selfing in the autoecious form.
Fungal Biology,
Vol. 128,
Issue. 8,
p.
2207.