Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:16:44.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular phylogeny of the genus Physconia (Ascomycota, Lecanorales) inferred from a Bayesian analysis of nuclear ITS rDNA sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2004

Oscar F. CUBERO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Ana CRESPO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Theodore L. ESSLINGER
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5517, USA.
H. Thorsten LUMBSCH
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA.
Get access

Abstract

A Bayesian analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences was used to infer phylogenetic relationships of 14 Physconia species. The analysis supports the monophyly of the genus. Three well supported clades can be distinguished within Physconia: the series griseae, venustae and pulverulentae. The relationships of these clades, however, is not resolved with confidence. Cortical characters are re-evaluated on the basis of the phylogenetic hypothesis. Anatomical features of the upper cortex are only diagnostic above the species level for two special forms of two-layered cortices, while morphological characters, such as lower surface and rhizine-type are characteristic for distinct clades. P. venusta and P. perisidiosa are not separated in this analysis, but populations of P. muscigena, and European and North American samples of P. americana are clearly distinct and the monophyly of both P. americana and P. muscigena s. lat. is rejected on the basis of a Bayesian hypothesis testing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)