Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:43:00.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFLP and RFLP (RG57) fingerprints can give conflicting evidence about the relatedness of isolates of Phytophthora infestans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2002

Andrew I. PURVIS
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK. Present address: Genomics Unit, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
Nicholas D. PIPE
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Jenny P. DAY
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
David S. SHAW
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Susan J. ASSINDER
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Selected isolates of Phytophthora infestans from around England and Wales were fingerprinted using both RG57, a multi-locus RFLP probe, and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs). The larger number of polymorphisms detectable with the AFLP method allowed resolution of several similar AFLP genotypes among isolates with identical RG57 fingerprints. However, some isolates with the same RG57 genotype had remarkably dissimilar AFLP genotypes, suggesting that there has been convergent evolution of some RG57 fingerprints. Also, some isolates with dissimilar RG57 fingerprints had similar or identical AFLP fingerprints. Both techniques distinguished isolates of mitochondrial DNA haplotype Ia from those of haplotype IIa. However, with AFLPs only, most of the isolates of A2 mating type were very similar and were distinguished from those of A1 mating type, suggesting that gene flow between A1 and A2 genotypes is limited and that sexual recombination is rare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)