Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:04:19.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zircaloy Corrosion in a Repository Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jerry D. Christian
Jerry D. Christian*
Affiliation:
National Spent Fuel Program Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company P. O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415
Get access

Abstract

Assessments are made of the corrosion characteristics of spent nuclear fuel Zircaloy cladding in a Yucca mountain repository environment and the potential for the cladding to provide protection against radionuclide release following waste package failure. Considerations and assumptions includes a waste package life near 10,000 years and air-saturated water contacted with waste package corrosion product goethite, based on the near-field geochemical environment evaluated in the Yucca Mountain Viability Assessment [3]. Literature corrosion data (general, pitting, and localized crevice attack) are evaluated on the basis of these conditions and the expected chemical environments that can result on the surface of the fuel. General corrosion of Zircaloy is expected to be negligible and result in a lifetime of the SNF cladding of several hundred thousand years, approaching a million years. General surface pitting is not expected. Effects of crevice localized corrosion for periods beyond 10,000 years are uncertain and require modeling development and experimental characterization. Details of the evaluations that provide the basis for the conclusions are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 935
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, U. S. Department of Energy Report DOE/RW-0508, December 1998. “OVERVIEW.”Google Scholar
2. CRWMS M&O, Total System Performance Assessment - Viability Assessment (TSPA-VA) Analyses Technical Basis Document, Las Vegas, Nevada, November 1998: CRWMS M&O. Chapter 4, “Near-Field Geochemical Environment,“B00000000-01707-4301-00004 REV 01.MOL.19981008.0004.Google Scholar
3. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, U. S. Department of Energy Report DOE/RW-0508, December 1998. Volume 3, Section 3.3, “NEAR-FIELD GEOCHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT.”Google Scholar
4. Triay, R., Meijer, A., Conca, J. L., Kung, S., Rundberg, R. S., and Strietelmeier, E. A., Summary and Synthesis Report on Radionuclide Retardation for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Program Milestone 3 784M, Draft 2/97, Eckhardt, R. C., editor. http://ecsl 3.lanl., i.ov/Milestones/3784rn/TOC.html.Google Scholar
5. Siegmann, E., E&S, Duke, personal communication, March 1998.Google Scholar
6. Maguire, M., “The Pitting Susceptibility of Zirconium in Aqueous Cl−, Br−, and I− Solutions,” in Industrial Applications of Titanium and Zirconium: Third Conference, New Orleans, La., September 21–23, 1982, Webster, R. T. and Young, S. S., Editors (ASTM Special Technical Publication 830).Google Scholar
7. Roine, A., Outokumpu HSC Chemistry®: for Windows, Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with Extensive Thermochemical Database, Version 3. 0, Outokumpu Research Oy, P.O. Box 60, FIN-28-101 PORI, FINLAND (April 30, 1997).Google Scholar
8. Pourbaix, M., Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, Second English Edition (National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, Texas, 1974).Google Scholar
9. McCoy, K., Framatome Cogema Fuels, personal communication, 1998.Google Scholar
10. Hillner, E., Franklin, D. G., and Smee, J. D., The Corrosion of Zircaloy-Clad Fuel Assemblies in a Geologic Repository Environment, Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory Report WAPD-T-3173, 1998.Google Scholar
11. Cragnolino, G. and Galvele, J. R., “Anodic Behavior and Pitting of Zirconium and Zircaloy-4 in Aqueous Solutions of Sodium Chloride,” in Frankenthan, R. P. and Kruger, J. (eds.), Passivation of Metals (The Electrochemical Society, Princeton, New Jersey, 1977), pp. 1053–1057.Google Scholar
12. Maraghini, M., Adams, G.B. Jr., and Rysselberghe, P. Van, J. Electrochem. Soc. 101, 419 (1954).Google Scholar
13. Yau, Te-Lin, “The Corrosion Properties of Zirconium Alloys in Chloride Solutions,” Corrosion 83, pp. 26/1-26/13, The International Corrosion Forum sponsored by the NACE, Anaheim, California, April 18-22, 1983.Google Scholar
14. Kain, R. M., “Crevice Corrosion,” in Metals Handbook® Ninth Edition, Volume 13, Corrosion (ASTM International, Metals Park, OH, 1987).Google Scholar
15. Farner, J., McCright, D., Huang, J-S.. Roy, A., Wilfinger, K., Hopper, R., Wang, F., Bedrossian, P., Estill, J., and Horn, J., Development of Integrated Mechanistically-Based Degradation-Mode Models for Performance Assessment of High-Level Waste Containers, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-ID-1 30811, June 1998.Google Scholar
16. Walton, J. C., “Mathematical Modeling of Mass Transport and Chemical Reaction in Crevice and Pitting Corrosion,” Corrosion Science 30, 915–928 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Walton, J. C., “Theoretical Modeling of Crevice and Pitting Corrosion Processes in Relation to Corrosion of Radioactive Waste Containers,” (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 1990) pp. 509–516.Google Scholar
18. Walton, J. C., “Corrosion Cells: An Important Factor in Localized Waste Package Geochemistry?,” Radioactive Waste Management 94, 114–123 (1991).Google Scholar
19. Walton, J. C., Cragnolino, G., and Kalandros, S. K., “A Numerical Model of Crevice Corrosion for Passive and Active Metals,” Corrosion Science 38, 1–18 (1996).Google Scholar
20. Konynenburg, R. A. Van, Radiation Chemical Effects in Experiments to Study the Reaction of Glass in an Environment of Gamma-IrradiatedA ir, Groundwater, and Tuff, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-53719, May 2, 1986.Google Scholar
21. Konynenburg, R. A. Van and Curtis, P. G., Corrosion Test on Candidate Waste Package Basket Materials for the Yucca Mountain Project, Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-JC-12326, January 1996.Google Scholar
22. Cox, B., “Stress Corrosion Cracking of Zircaloy-2 in Neutral Aqueous Chloride Solutions at 25 C,” Corrosion 29, 157–166 (1973).Google Scholar
23. Little, B. and Wagner, P., “An Overview of Microbiologically Influenced corrosion of Metals and Alloys Used in the Storage of Nuclear Wastes,“ Canadian J. of Microbiology 42, 367–374 (1996).Google Scholar
24. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, U. S. Department of Energy Report DOE/RW-0508, December 1998. Volume 3, Section 3.4, “WASTE PACKAGE DEGRADATION.”Google Scholar
25. McNeil, M., and Odom, A., “Thermodynamic Prediction of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria,“ Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion Testing. ASTMSTP 1232, Kearns, J. R. and Little, B. J., Editors (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1994) pp. 173–179.Google Scholar