Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:01:04.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Reflectivity Study of Single- and Bicrystals of Gold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. R. Fitzsimmons ,
E. Burkel  and
J. Peisl
M. R. Fitzsimmons
Affiliation:
Sektion Physik der Universitit Mfinchen, Mfinchen, FRG
E. Burkel
Affiliation:
Sektion Physik der Universitit Mfinchen, Mfinchen, FRG
J. Peisl
Affiliation:
Sektion Physik der Universitit Mfinchen, Mfinchen, FRG
Get access

Abstract

X-ray reflectivity techniques have been used to characterize the surfaces of 0.4µm thick Au films epitaxially grown on single-crystals of NaCl. Measurements of both the specular and non-specular reflectivity suggest that the Au surface is very rough. The nonspecular reflectivity provides valuable information about the correlation of the heights at different points on the surface. The first in situ reflectivity study of the formation and destruction of a grain boundary shows direct evidence for the existence of diffuse scattering from the grain boundary. Measurements of several [0011 twist grain boundaries suggest that the roughness and texture of an interface depends upon the geometrical orientation of the surrounding substrates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 208: Symposium J – Advances in Surface and Thin Film Diffraction , 1990 , 339
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Presently at LANSCE Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545 USA.Google Scholar
2. Parratt, L.G., Phys. JRev. 95, 359 (1954).Google Scholar
3. Segmüller, A., Thin Solid Films 18, 287 (1973).Google Scholar
4. Braslau, A., Deutsch, M. Pershan, P S Weiss, A.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 114 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Fitzsimmons, M.R. and Sass, S. L., Acta metall. 36, 3103 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Fitzsimmons, M.R. and Sass, S.L., Acta metall. 37 1009 (1989)Google Scholar
7. Matthews, J.W., Epitaxial Growth Part A, 128 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Schober, T. and Balluffi, R.W., Phil. Mag. 20, 511 (1969).Google Scholar
9. Als-Nielsen, J. and Pershan, P.S., Nuel. Instrum. Methods 208, 545 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Nevot, L. and Croce, P., Rev. de Phys. Appl. 15, 761 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Dietrich, S. and Wagner, H., Z. Phys. B- Condensed Matter 56, 207 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Sinha, S.K., Sirota, E.B. Garoff, S. and Stanley, H.B., Phys. Rev. B38 2297 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Wallner, G., Burkel, E., Metzger, H. and Peisl, J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 108, 129 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Newton, I., Optiks, London (1704).Google Scholar
15. Young, T., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. part I, 41 (1802).Google Scholar