Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:43:33.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Measurements of Lattice Strain in Doped Epitaxial Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. P. Pogany  and
T. E. Preuss
A. P. Pogany
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Technology Centre and Department of Applied Physics, RMIT, Box 2476V, G.P.O. Melbourne 3001, Australia.
T. E. Preuss
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Technology Centre and Department of Applied Physics, RMIT, Box 2476V, G.P.O. Melbourne 3001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

(100) silicon amorphized by antimony ion implantation was epitaxially regrown by either furnace or pulsed laser annealing. Rocking curves were measured on a double-crystal X-ray diffractometer, and compared with calculations based on a one-dimensional strain profile. For laser annealed samples the strain profile followed that of the antimony (redistributed by surface melting), with a proportionality constant given by the Pauling covalent radius ratio. For furnace annealed samples however the strain was found to be deeper, but of smaller peak magnitude, than that expected from the antimony distribution. This is attributed to formation and movement of defects acting to relax lattice strain. Other X-ray strain measurements on epitaxial silicon containing other dòpants are briefly reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 93: Symposium C – Materials Modification and Growth Using Ion Beams , 1987 , 405
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Burgeat, J. and Taupin, D., Acta Cryst. A24, 99 (1968).Google Scholar
2. Fukuhara, A. and Takano, Y., Acta Cryst. A33, 137 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Fukuhara, A. and Takano, Y., J. Appl. Cryst. 10, 287 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Fukuhara, A., Takano, Y., Namba, M. and Maki, M., J. Appl. Cryst. 13, 31 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Appleton, B.R., Larson, B.C., White, C.W., Narayan, J., Wilson, S.R. and Pronko, P.P., in Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing, edited by Ferris, S.D., Leamy, H.J. and Poate, J.M. (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1979), p.291.Google Scholar
6. Larson, B.C., White, C.W. and Appleton, B.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 801 (1978).Google Scholar
7. Larson, B.C. and Barhorst, J.F., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3181 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Nemiroff, M. and Speriosu, V.S., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 3735 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Pogany, A.P., Preuss, T., Short, K.T., Wagenfeld, H.K. and Williams, J.S., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. 209/210, 731 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Williams, J.S. and Short, K.T., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8663 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Narayan, J. and Holland, O.W., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 73, 225 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Takagi, S., Acta Cryst. 15, 1311 (1962).Google Scholar
13. Taupin, D., Bull. Soc. Franc. Miner. Crist. 87, 469 (1964).Google Scholar
14. Pauling, L., The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd Ed. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1960).Google Scholar
15. Gibbons, J.F., Johnson, W.S. and Mylroie, S.W., Projected Range Statistics, 2nd ed. (Halsted Press, 1975).Google Scholar