Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:48:15.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Diffuse Scattering Investigation of Defects in Ion Implanted and Annealed Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. H. Chang ,
U. Beck ,
T. H. Metzger  and
J. R. Patel
C. H. Chang
Affiliation:
SSRL/SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 ALS, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
U. Beck
Affiliation:
Sektion Physik der Universität München, 80539 München, Germany
T. H. Metzger
Affiliation:
Sektion Physik der Universität München, 80539 München, Germany
J. R. Patel
Affiliation:
SSRL/SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 ALS, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

To characterize the point defects and point defect clusters introduced by ion implantation and annealing, we have used grazing incidence x-rays to measure the diffuse scattering in the tails of Bragg peaks (Huang Scattering). An analysis of the diffuse scattered intensity will allow us to characterize the nature of point defects or defect clusters introduced by ion implantation. We have also observed unexpected satellite peaks in the diffuse scattered tails. Possible causes for the occurrence of the peaks will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 524: Symposium V – Application of Synchrotron Radiation Techniques…IV , 1998 , 95
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fahey, P. M., Griffm, P. B. and Plummer, J. D., Rev. Mod. Physics 61, 289 (1989)Google Scholar
2. Gossmann, H-J., Rafferty, C. S., Luftmann, H. S., Unterwald, F. C., Boone, T. and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 639 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Michel, A. E., Rausch, W., Ronsheim, P. A. and Kastl, R. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50,417 (1989)Google Scholar
4. Pelaz, L., Gilmer, G. H., Jaraiz, M., Gossmann, H-J., Rafferty, C.S., Eaglesham, D.J., and Poate, J.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol.469, 341 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Giles, M. D., Yue, S., Kennel, H. W., and Packan, P.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.469, 253, (1997)Google Scholar
6. Ehrhart, P. , J. Nucl. Mat. 216, 174 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Grotenhans, S., Wallner, G., Burkel, E., Metzger, H., Peisl, J. and Wagner, H., Phys. Rev. B39, 8450 (1989)Google Scholar
8. Nordlund, K., Patrtyka, P., and Averbach, R. S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 469, 199 (1997)Google Scholar
9. Caturla, M-J. (Personal communication)Google Scholar
10. Zhu, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol.469, 151 (1997)Google Scholar
11. Caturla, M-J., Diaz de la Rubia, T., Zhu, J. and Johnson, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol.469, 335 (1997)Google Scholar