Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:04:03.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffraction and TEM Studies of the Delamination of Copper Thin Films from Glass and Silica Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Alan G. Fox
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Rowland M. Cannon
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

The events associated with fractures along interfaces between copper thin films and glass substrates were investigated by X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In the as-bonded films the Bragg diffraction lines were shifted and broadened (relative to pure strain-free copper) due to residual in-plane tensile strains arising from the differences in thermal contraction between the copper and the substrates; TEM studies of these films in cross-section showed that the residual stresses had been relieved somewhat by dislocation densities as high as 1010 lines/cm2 in Cu/SiO2 films.

The passage of a crack along the Cu/glass interfaces led to a significant reduction in the line shift and a slight reduction in the line broadening. Thus dislocations generated by the fracture events ‘plastically relaxed’ the residual stresses present in the as-bonded Cu by superposing a compressive component onto the pre-existing in-plane tensile strains. This dislocation generation was confirmed by TEM studies. In addition, it was found that the greater the strength of an interface, the greater was the reduction in mean strain due to the fracture; this is consistent with a larger crack-tip plastic zone and the generation of greater numbers of dislocations in the Cu films by fracture along interfaces of higher toughness (i.e. bond strength).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Oh, T.S., Cannon, R.M. and Ritchie, R.O., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 70(12) (1987), pC-352.Google Scholar
[2] Oh, T.S., Rodel, J., Cannon, R.M. and Ritchie, R.O., Acta Met., 36 (1988), p2083.Google Scholar
[3] Oh, T.S., Cannon, R.M. and Ritchie, R.O., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 130 (1989), p219.Google Scholar
[4] Blackman, J. et. al. to be published.Google Scholar
[5] Wilson, A.J.C., Proc. Phys. Soc., 80 (1962), p286.Google Scholar
[6] Warren, B.E. and Averbach, B.L., J. Appl. Phys., 50 (1950), p595.Google Scholar
[7] Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L.E., ‘X-ray Diffraction Procedures’ (New YorkJohn Wiley and Sons) (1974), Chapter 9, p618.Google Scholar
[8] Drugan, W.J., Rice, J.R. and Sham, T.L., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 30 (1982), p447.Google Scholar
[9] Ritchie, R.O. and Thompson, A.W., Met Trans 16A (1985), p233.Google Scholar
[10] Suzuki, A. et. al., Adv. in X-ray Analysis 30 (1987), p537.Google Scholar
[11] Shih, C.F. and Asaro, R.J., J. Appl. Mech. 55 (1988), p299.Google Scholar