Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:22:28.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XPS and Magnetization Measurements Study of CrMn Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Wathiq Abdul-Razzaq
Affiliation:
Physics Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, U.S.A.
Unchul Lee
Affiliation:
U.S. Army research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Cr1-xMnx (x < 6.3 %) alloy in the bulk form is an interesting complex system that behaves in many but not all respects like a spin-glass system. In this study, 14 nm-size CrMn nanoparticles with 5% Mn, were synthesized by ball milling of Cr and Mn particles in Ar atmosphere. After 50 hours of milling, the x-ray diffraction pattern indicated alloying of the two metals Cr and Mn. However XPS data indicated the formation of MnO2 and Cr2O3oxides on the surface of the chromium core in the nanoparticle. These oxides on the surface, like the Cr core, are antiferromagnets. Magnetization (M) measurement at 200 G as a function of temperature (T), after zero-field-cooling, showed that M increased as T increased from 5 K all the way to 330 K, beyond the Neel temperatures of the Cr and the oxides. Even though the magnetization value is in the range of a typical antiferromagnet at all temperatures from 5 to 330 K, the shape of M versus T curve is neither that of an antiferromagnet nor of a spin-glass. It appears that the behavior of the magnetization curve is due to the frustration of the spins by weak fields associated with spin-density-wave and by the existence of the oxides. This frustration should be different from the frustration of the spins due to the ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic competition in spin-glass systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sternlieb, B.J., Lorenzo, E., Shirane, G., Werner, S.A. and Fawcett, E., Phys. Rev. B, 50, 16438 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Fawcett, E., Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 209 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Galkin, V. Yu., Fawcett, E., Ali, N. and Ortiz, W.A., J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 212, L1 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Galkin, V. Yu., Camargo, P.C. de, Ali, N. and Fawcett, E., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7, L649 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Galkin, V. Yu., Camargo, P.C. de, Ali, N., Schaf, J. and Fawcett, E., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 7925 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Klug, H.P., and Alexander, L.E. X-Ray Diffraction Procedures (John Wiley, NY 1974).Google Scholar
7. Ibrahim, M.M., Zhao, J. and Seehra, M.S., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1856 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Neel, L. in Low temperature Physics, edited by Dewitt, C., Dreyyfus, B. and deGennes, P.D. (Goorgon and Breach, NY 1962) P. 413.Google Scholar
9. Makhlouf, S.A., F.T. and Berkowitz, A.E., Phys. Rev. B 55, R14717 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, J.S. and Bean, C.P. in Magnetism edited by Rado, G.T. and Suhl, H. (Academic press, NY) Vol. III P. 294 (1963) and references therein.Google Scholar
11. kodama, R.H. and Berkowitz, A.E., Phys. Rev. B 59, 6321 (1999).Google Scholar