Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:26:38.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Limits Magnetic Polaron Energies in DMS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

P. A. Wolff
Affiliation:
Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
L. R. Ram-Mohan
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
Get access

Extract

Magnetic polarons are ferromagnetic spin clusters created by the exchange interaction of a carrier spin (electron or hole) with localized spins imbedded in a semiconductor lattice. They were first studied in magnetic semiconductors [1]; more recently, there have been extensive investigations [2] of polaron behavior in diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS), such as Cd1−xMnxTe. DMS are favorable media for magnetic polaron studies because they have simple s-p bands and excellent optical properties. Two types of magnetic polarons have been identified in DMS - the bound magnetic polaron (BMP), whose carrier is localized by an impurity [3], and the free polaron (FP) consisting of a carrier trapped by its own, self-consistently-maintained, exchange potential [4].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Nagaev, E., Physics of Magnetic Semiconductors (MIR Publishers, Moscow, 1983).Google Scholar
2 Wolff, P. and Warnock, J., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2300 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Golnik, A., Gaj, J., Nawrocki, M., PlaneT, R., and Guillaume, C. Benoit a la, Proc. XV Intl. Conf. Phys. Semiconductors, Kyoto, 1980 (J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Suppl. A49, pg. 819); M. Nawrocki, R. Planel, G. Fishman, and R. Galazka, Proc. XV Intl. Conf. Phys. Semiconductors, Kyoto, 1980 (J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Suppl. A49, pg. 819), pg. 823.Google Scholar
4 Golnik, A., Ginter, J., and Gaj, J., J. Phys. C16, 6073 (1983).Google Scholar
5 Dietl, T. and Spalek, J., Phys. Rev. Letters 48, 355 (1982); T. Dietl and J. Spalek, Phys. Rev. B28. 1548 (1983); D. Heiman, P. Wolff, and J. Warnock, Phys. Rev. B27, 4848 (1983).Google Scholar
6 Zhung, T. and Planel, R., Proc. XVI Intl. Conf. Phys. of Semiconductors, Montpellier, Physica 117B – 118B, 488 (1980).Google Scholar
7 Kasuya, T., Yanase, A., and Takeda, T., Sol. State Comm. 8, 1543 (1970).Google Scholar
8 Heiman, D., Isaacs, E.D., Becla, P., and Foner, S. (to be published); D. Heiman, E.D. Isaacs, S. Foner, A. Wold, K. Dwight, and D. Ridgely (to be published).Google Scholar
9 Zayhowski, J., Ph. D. Thesis, MIT, 1985.Google Scholar
10 Schafer, W. and Nitsche, R., Mat. Res. Bull. 9, 645 (1974).Google Scholar
11 Spalek, J., Phys. Rev. B30, 5345 (1984).Google Scholar