Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:51:10.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variational. Principies for Fuil-Potentiai. Muiltiple Scattering Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. K. Nesbet*
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Ilarry Road, San Jose, California 95120-6099
Get access

Abstract

The variational principle of Kohn and Rostokcr (KR) implies that the determinant of a product of matrices vanishes at energy eigenvalues. The standard KKR method uses square matrices appropriate to a truncated spherical harmonic expansion, and sets the determinant of one matrix in this product to zero. For general nonspherical potentials in space-filling local cells, the KR variational principle requires these matrices to be rectangular, since the intermediate sum should extend over a complete set of solid harmonic functions. If extended in this way, the intermediate sum can be replaced by a Wronskian surface integral over the interfaces of adjacent space-filling atomic cells, as formulated in the variational principle of Schlosser and Marcus. E-quivalence of these two different variational principles is established here in the limit of completeness of the intermediate sum. The practical implication is that the standard KKR method is not well founded for the full-potential problem. Improved results for low-order basis function expansions can be obtained by including a Wronskian interface integral in full-potential ACO calculations, as a variational completion of the truncated intermediate K KR sum. A revision of CPA alloy theory is proposed that avoids dependence on this intermediate sum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Korringa, I., Physica 13, 392 (1947).Google Scholar
2. Kohn, W. and Rostoker, N., Phys. Rev. 94, 1111 (1954).Google Scholar
3. Nesbet, R. K., Phys. Rev. B 41, 4948 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Schlosser, H. and Marcus, P. M., Phys. Rev. 131, 2529 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ferreira, L. G. and Leite, J. R., Phys. Rev. A 18, 335 (1978); A. C. Ferraz, M. I. T. Chagas, E. K. Takahashi, and J. R. leite, Phys. Rev. B 29, 7003 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Nesbet, R. K., Phys. Rev. A 38, 4955 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Soven, P., Phys. Rev. 156, 809 (1967); B. L. Gyorffy and G. M. Stocks, J. de Physique 35, C4-75 (1974); G. M. Stocks, W. M. Temmerman, and B. L. Gyorffy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 339 (1978).Google Scholar