Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:02:50.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vapor Treatment of Copper Surface Using Organic Acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kenji Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Association of Super-advanced Electronics Technologies (ASET) 3-1 Wakamiya, Morinosato, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198 JAPAN
Teruo Yagishita
Affiliation:
Association of Super-advanced Electronics Technologies (ASET) 3-1 Wakamiya, Morinosato, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198 JAPAN
Moritaka Nakamura
Affiliation:
Association of Super-advanced Electronics Technologies (ASET) 3-1 Wakamiya, Morinosato, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198 JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

The mechanism for cleaning Cu surfaces using the vapor from organic acids was studied by infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy (IR-RAS) and by analysis of products collected using a cold-trap placed downstream of a reactor. When formic acid vapor was exposed to oxidized Cu samples heated to about 200°C for about a half an hour, the oxides were reduced. The surface seemed to have a shiny metallic appearance but no Cu-containing volatile products were collected, and the decomposition of formic acid molecules into CO2 was observed. In contrast, using acetic acid vapor, Cu-containing etching products were collected and identified as a dinuclear Cu (II) acetate complex. The vapor treatment using formic and acetic acids can be reduced Cu oxides to have metallic Cu surfaces. Furthermore, controlling temperature and choice of organic acids enabled the advantageous establishment of a control for the reduction in, and etching of, the Cu oxides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Furusawa, T. et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, G190 (2001).Google Scholar
2. George, M. A., et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 961 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Ueno, K., et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 2986 (1998).Google Scholar
4. O'Keeffe, M., J. Chem. Phys. 39, 1789 (1963).Google Scholar
5. McIntyre, N. S., et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 714 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Yagishita, T., et al., Ext. Abst. Electrochem. Soc. Spring Meeting (Paris, 2003), F2425.Google Scholar