Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:22:24.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vacancy Enhanced Boron Activation during Room Temperature Implantation and Low Temperature Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Jian-Yue Jina
Affiliation:
Physics Department, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204
Irene Rusakova
Affiliation:
Physics Department, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204
Qinmian Li
Affiliation:
Physics Department, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204
Jiarui Liu
Affiliation:
Physics Department, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204
Wei-Kan Chu
Affiliation:
Physics Department, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204
Get access

Abstract

Low temperature annealing combined with pre-damage (or preamorphization) implantation is a very promising method to overcome the activation barrier in ultra-shallow junction formation. We have made a 32 nm p+/n junction with sheet resistance of 290 /sq. using 20 keV 4×1014 Ω/cm2 Si followed by 2 keV 1×1015 at./cm2 B implantation and 10 minutes 550 °C annealing. This paper studies the boron activation mechanism during low temperature annealing. The result shows that placing B profile in the vacancyrich region has much better boron activation than placing B profile in interstitial-rich region or without pre-damage. It also shows that a significant portion of boron is in substitutional positions before annealing. The amount of substitutional boron is correlated to the amount of vacancies (damage) by the pre-damage Si implantation. The result supports our speculation that vacancy enhances boron activation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose CV, 1997.Google Scholar
2Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc, Demo documentation, not published.Google Scholar
3 Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., Rafferty, C. S., Gilmer, G. H., Jaraiz, M., Poate, J. M., Luftman, H. S., and Haynes, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6031 (1997).10.1063/1.364452Google Scholar
4 Jin, Jian-Yue, Liu, Jiarui., Heide, P.A.W. Van dee, and Chu, Wei_kan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 574(2000)10.1063/1.125821Google Scholar
5 Jin, Jian-Yue, Li, Qinmian, Lu, Xinming, Shao, Lin, Liu, Jiarui, and Chu, Wei-Kan, submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
6 Larson, Larryet. al., Discussion in “Source/Drain Engineering Working Group Meeting”, Raleigh, North Carolina, November 1, 1999.Google Scholar
7 Mayer, J.W. and Rimini, E., “Ion Beam Handbook for Material Analysis”, Academic Press, Inc. New York, 1977.Google Scholar
8 North, J.C. and Gibson, W.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 126 (1970)10.1063/1.1653123Google Scholar
9 Feldman, L. C., Mayer, J.W., Picraux, S.T., “Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling”, Academic Press, Inc. New York, 1982.Google Scholar
10 Liu, Jinning and Metha, sandeep, This proceeding.Google Scholar