Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:30:37.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Additives for Reducing Hydrogen Yield in Mortar Containing Slag and Chloride Salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Michele A. Lewis
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439
David W. Warren
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

Cementitious waste forms are being considered for immobilizing nuclear waste before disposal. In earlier work, it was found that irradiation of a mortar formulation consisting of slag, portland cement, fly ash, water, and up to 10 wt % KCI-LiCl salt resulted in the generation of hydrogen. Yields were relatively high and the rates of generation were constant for the irradiation period investigated. The addition of small amounts of oxygenrich electron scavengers (NaN03, NaI04, KMn04, or Ag20) to the mortar was investigated as a means for reducing hydrogen yields. The addition of NaN03 reduced the hydrogen yield; changed the radiolytic products from hydrogen to a mixture of hydrogen, nitrogen, and N20; and reduced the pressurization rate after exposure to 400 Mrads. The addition of NaI04 and KMn04 reduced hydrogen yields slightly while the addition of Ag20 increased the yield. Moreover, the addition of FeS to a non-slag mortar changed the radiolysis mechanism but the addition of FeO did not. The results of these experiments provided an insight into the nature of the radiolytic reactions occurring in the mortar formulations and indicated that the radiolytic generation of gases might be controlled with the proper choice of additive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Columbo, P. and Nielson, R. M. Jr, Properties of Radioactive Wastes and Waste Containers, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL-NUREG-50951Google Scholar
2. Bibler, N. E., Radiolytic Gas Production from Concrete Containing Savannah River Plant Waste, DP-1464 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Steindler, M. J. et al., Chemical Technology Division Annual Technical Report 1988, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-89-15 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Fischer, D. F. and Johnson, T. R., Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management, Spectrum '88, Am. Nuc. Soc., LaGrange Park, IL, 102 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Lewis, M. A. and Warren, D. W., presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Am. Cer. Soc., Indianapolis, IN, 1989 (unpublished).Google Scholar
6. Draganic, I. G. and Draganic, Z. D., The Radiation Chemistry of Water, Academic Press, New York, NY (1971).Google Scholar
7. Spinks, J. W. T. and Woods, R. J., An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry, 2nd Ed., J. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY (1976).Google Scholar
8.ASTM C305, Method for Mechanical Mixing of Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes (1982).Google Scholar
9.ASTM C109-77, Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (1977).Google Scholar
10. Anbar, M., Bambenk, M., and Ross, A. B., Selected Specific Rates of Reactions of Transients from Water in Aqueous Solution. 1. Hydrated Electron, Supplemental Data, NSRDS-NBS 43, U.S. Dept. Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1973).Google Scholar
11. Lammertz, H. and Kroth, K., Spez. Bev. Kernforschungsanlage Juelich, Juel-Spez-430 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Sonder, E. and Sibley, W. A., Point Defects in Solids, eds. Crawford, J. H. and Stifkin, A., Plenum Press, New York, NY, p. 201 (1971).Google Scholar
13. Levy, P. W., Nuc. Tech. 60, 231 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Lewis, M. A., unpublished results.Google Scholar