Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:54:16.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Uptake of Strontium by Calcium Silicate Hydrates under High pH Conditions: An Experimental Approach to Distinguish Adsorption from Co-precipitation Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

J. Tits
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Waste Management, CH 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
E. Wieland
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Waste Management, CH 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
J.-P. Dobler
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Waste Management, CH 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
D. Kunz
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Waste Management, CH 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

The interaction of Sr(II) with CSH phases has been investigated to distinguish adsorption from co-precipitation processes and to assess the relevance of these processes for performance assessments. Batch-type sorption experiments were carried out to study the adsorption of Sr(II) on synthetic CSH phases at different C:S ratios. Co-precipitation experiments were conducted by precipitating CSH phases in the presence of Sr(II) at two different precipitation rates.

Distribution ratios (Rd) of Sr(II) obtained from the sorption and co-precipitation studies were found to be similar in value. The results indicate that co-precipitation processes do not enhance Sr(II) uptake by CSH compared to adsorption. In both the co-precipitation and adsorption experiments the same sorption sites are accessible to Sr(II). The precipitation rate of the CSH phases has no significant influence on the Rd values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Crawford, M.B., & Savage, D., The Effects of Alkaline Plume Migration from a Cementitious Repository in Crystalline and Marl Host Rocks. Technical Report, WE/93/20C, Britisch Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK (1994).Google Scholar
2. Pointeau, L., Piriou, B., Fedoroff, M., Barthes, M.G., Marmier, N., & Fromage, F., J. Coll. Int. Sci. 236, 252259 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Pomiès, M. -P., Lequeux, N., & Boch, P., Cem. Concr. Res. 31, 563569 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Ziegler, F., Gieré, R., & Johnson, A., Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 45564561 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Mucci, A., & Morse, J.W., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47, 217233 (1983).Google Scholar
6. ATesoriero, J., & Pankow, J.F., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 10531063 (1996).Google Scholar
7. O'Day, P.A., Structure, Bonding, and Site preference of Cobalt(II) Sorption Complexes on Kaolinite and Quartz from Solution and Spectroscopic Studies. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, USA (1992).Google Scholar
8. Atkins, M., Glasser, F.P., & Kindness, A., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, 241246 (1992),Google Scholar
9. Tits, J., Stumpf, T., Rabung, T., Wieland, E., & Fanghänel, T., Environ. Sci. Technol. submitted (2003).Google Scholar